Author Topic: Gun Art Review  (Read 2348 times)

Texas_Bryan

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1011
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Gun Art Review
« on: March 09, 2009, 10:15:16 PM »
Alright Team,

As you guys know I'm a video game dev and I'm asking for opinions on a couple pieces I'm doing for a personal project, mainly cause I don't own these weapons, and there will be many more in the future.  I'm making these guns in a 3D modeling software package and I'll texture them later in Photoshop, which is putting the color and fine bump detail(scratches and nicks) on.

This first one up is a Winchester 1894 lever action.  I don't own this weapon and I was working off a half dozen reference pictures, so I don't got the whole picture.  Any way, let me know what you think and if you see any corrections that could be made, such as, that's too small, too big, add this, move that.  And if you know of any corrections great, if you could provide pics then that would be awesome.  If I could get pics of the top of the receiver open and then shut, and a pic of the bolt open, that would be a ton of help.

Also whats the largest caliber made for the 1894 that was in use?

Thanks Guys

MikeBjerum

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10991
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1134
Re: Gun Art Review
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2009, 10:21:03 PM »
As someone that also does not poses that model I will not give technical advice.  However, I can not pass without saying that I like what you've done, and I'm sure that with a little input you will nail it.

Good Job!
If I appear taller than other men it is because I am standing on the shoulders of others.

twyacht

  • "Cogito, ergo armatum sum."
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10419
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Gun Art Review
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2009, 10:36:52 PM »
You are close enough. 8)



Even in a "virtual" rendering,



A good Winchester always looks better with a little "wear" on the stock.



Thomas Jefferson: The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government. That is why our masters in Washington are so anxious to disarm us. They are not afraid of criminals. They are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants."
Col. Jeff Cooper.

CZShooter

  • IDPA SO/MD, NRA RSO
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 325
  • CZ75...the choice of anime's hottest bounty hunter
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Gun Art Review
« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2009, 10:43:02 PM »
Looks good, dude. I think that's the perfect excuse to have to go out and buy one...for research, of course.  ;D I wanna say 45/90 was the largest caliber offered (there are others with a lot more knowledge in this area). I'm pretty sure it was at least offered in 45/70.
If the women don't find you handsome...they should at least find you handy.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Gun Art Review
« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2009, 10:56:48 PM »
You are close enough. 8)




You missed the rear Barrel band and the one you have holding the front of the mag tube should also go all the way around the barrel, or does that go in the later stuff ?

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: Gun Art Review
« Reply #5 on: Today at 11:10:47 PM »

sanjuancb

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 246
  • The years teach much which the days never knew.
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Gun Art Review
« Reply #5 on: March 09, 2009, 11:22:15 PM »
The larger caliber variants are really not representative of the rifle. Winchester offered "Big Bore" models in .444 Marlin, .450 Marlin, and .45/70, but the rifle itself was a bit different. The scale and design was altogether different. The rifle, for all intents and purposes was built for the .30-.30 Winchester. If you want to be true to the design, you need to look at one in that caliber. Your renders look pretty good...

Look at these:
http://www.americanrifleman.org/rifles_explodedViews.html

http://www.rarewinchesters.com/images/Exploded%20Views/1894%20Exploded%20View.jpg



"It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself for a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat."
Theodore Roosevelt

shooter32

  • shooter32
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2945
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 41
Re: Gun Art Review
« Reply #6 on: March 10, 2009, 04:17:35 AM »
Bryan good job! Let us see it when your done!

Tom, great porn of the levers!!! ;D
A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have. ~ Gerald Ford - August 12, 1974

Texas_Bryan

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1011
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Gun Art Review
« Reply #7 on: March 10, 2009, 04:25:31 AM »
The larger caliber variants are really not representative of the rifle. Winchester offered "Big Bore" models in .444 Marlin, .450 Marlin, and .45/70, but the rifle itself was a bit different. The scale and design was altogether different. The rifle, for all intents and purposes was built for the .30-.30 Winchester. If you want to be true to the design, you need to look at one in that caliber. Your renders look pretty good...

Look at these:
http://www.americanrifleman.org/rifles_explodedViews.html

http://www.rarewinchesters.com/images/Exploded%20Views/1894%20Exploded%20View.jpg





I figured the .30-.30 was THE caliber and you could have had big slug gun versions, but if the .30-.30 was THE primary caliber then that's a great bit of info, I'd like for it to be a rifle and not a slug gun. :)  I brought the mag tube out to be flush with the barrel.  And on the barrel band, I got the hex barrel going on, and in all the reference I looked up I didn't see a hex with the band, sucks cause I like them.

Thanks guys

Texas_Bryan

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1011
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Gun Art Review
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2009, 04:27:07 AM »

Tom, great porn of the levers!!! ;D

Put your pants back on! :-[ :-[ :-[

Pathfinder

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6447
  • DRTV Ranger -- NRA Life Member
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 86
Re: Gun Art Review
« Reply #9 on: March 10, 2009, 05:36:00 AM »
You are close enough. 8)



A good Winchester always looks better with a little "wear" on the stock.

TW, please tell me about the musket style 1894, second from the top in your phot. Now that I look at it a second time, that's in a museum somewhere, no?

And would everyone please stop talking about pants ! ! ? ? Please?  ???
"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do this to others and I require the same from them"

J.B. Books

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk