The financial situation at Remington has been horrible for years. They are deeply in debt and for the amount of revenue brought in the profit picture ain't pretty. While they were still public I recall something in the order of a quarter BILLION in debt and negative profit.
Cerberus surely approached the acquisition with a plan, but it may not be to anyone's liking. Clearly they are shifting management around to help solve those problems. If it don't work then its back to slash and burn. On a tiny scale look what they did with Cobb Manufacturing. Gave Patel a new position and dissolved the company. Now Remington has a stronger brand, but that doesn't mean they would keep all the factories open, the product line as extensive as it is now, or wouldn't sell off a division (ammo, LE etc etc). Cerberus isn't buying up the companies for some altruistic reason. They want to make money, and lots of it. So as the godfather says...It's nothing personal, just business.
Just as a side note. George Kollitides of Cerberus is running for the NRA board of directors. I will be dammed if I vote for him. It sends up all sorts of red flags that a guy from the company that owns a significant piece of the firearms business is also going to influence my political rights. No f'ing way. If anyone falls for that, shame on him. I don't want someone who may have allegiances that conflict with protecting my rights pure and simple. I wish him the best in business but he ain't gonna call the shots from the ground to 30,000 ft up. That used to be called a robber barron.