The trouble with that Tom, is that a "suscpicous vessel" is every fishing boat with 4 guys on board. These folks are fishermen and make their living fron the sea. 1 If we don't let them leave port they, and their families starve. This drives them into the hands of the jihadis and we lose strategically, even if we win tactically (cf Vietnam) 2because there is lot more going on in Somalia than pirates 3 (I will give a history in a later post if you want). Better to make it clear that attackng a US vessel is a quick way to die. As far as attacking their bases, I'm on board, but we need to understand its going to ugly, bloody, and that lots of innocents and hostages will die 4 . It would be in our strategic (not moral, because we're right) interest to get the international community 5 (defined as those who have ships and men to contribute) behind us before diving into the sewer. I think we have to make that dive, but as a stop gap measure putting the USMC on board our ships seems like a good option. 6
FQ13
1) Wrong, fishing is hard work, if they were fishing they would not have time for piracy. secondly none of the photo's of pirate vessels has shown any nets or other fishing gear.
2) Don't get me started on that one I can go on for a while.

3) Another glowing example of the political skills of indigenous people who saw their greatest glory since biblical times as a colony of Italy, typified by clan warfare and famine.
4) that was one of the arguments used about the Barbary Pirates in Jefferson's time. It was BS then and it's BS now, the fact is that alot MORE innocent people will die if we do not kill the guilty, and the ones in boats 30 miles off shore are not the ones giving the orders any more the the "Corsairs" in the "Chebecks" were 210 years ago. The people on shore are not innocent as this is the prime industry , the pirates could not function without the support facilities provided by shore bases. To supply a historical example, after the British Navy and an earth quake flattened Port Royal (a notorious Pirate hang out in the Caribbean) the days of attacks on the Spanish Main were pretty much over.
5) Another flawed idea from Jefferson's time. Considering that there has been no industry in Somali for about 30 years , where pray tell are they getting weapons, ammunition, fuel, communications gear ? Where are they disposing of their loot ? In your precious "International community is where. Massive destruction in Somalia sends a message to any surviving pirates, but it sends a far more important message to countries like Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iran, North Korea and Russia.
6) It would simply cause them to change their tactics, as long as we allow them base areas it will simply be a battle of methods and counters that will never end. Wipe out the base areas and the problem is not capable of surviving.
You know an interesting overlooked detail of TR's gun boat diplomacy was that countries were a lot nicer and FAR more willing to work out a REASONABLE agreement when we had a Fleet conducting a "Good will" tour of their waters.
Your arguments on this subject illustrate why Santayana specified LEARN history, not just read it.