The information was for machining quality which should equate to accuracy, Yes?
Question....I don't shoot rifles much any more and never needed to know MOA though I have no problem with the equation or understanding it. How many rifles come off the shelf, without custom shop work and can shoot 1 minute of angle consistantly?
What of breaking in of barrels, etc...equates to accuracy? Other than competition, what real world need, other than long range scout snipers would one need or even care if a rifle could shoot 1/2" groups at 1000 yards (1 MOA @1000 yds = .47")
I really like the quality of the new Hawkeye in 223 and the LCR I bought. I liked the quality put into the SR9 I gave away....
I just didn't like the damned 10-1/2 lb trigger after the recall....I would have kept it had I known the sucky trigger was coming back. The 223 trigger isn't bad and the LCR's trigger is really good, I think, for a production snubbie. The LCR cylinder is well machined, everything seems to be timed perfectly and the action is smooth...I stay on target as well as anything else double acting I shoot.
I sure wish they'd make an optional 4-7 lb trigger so I could buy another SR9. Dang I loved that gun...1,500 rounds, nary a failure...shot dirty, shot clean, shot well....Oh well, a friend has it now....Instead I'm carrying a CZ 75 when the LCR isn't in my pocket.
And that Hawkeye...well inside 3/4" at 100 yards from a rest with Winchester Supremes....5 shot group. I have no complaints about the Hawkeye or the trigger that comes with it.....and I really, really, like the controlled round feed. I tend to feed the weapon very slowly whilst watching a target...something I guess I need to train out of...but the controlled round feed solves my past problems of slow feed so I'm really happy with it.