Restaurant with anti-gun policy saved by a gun

[tombogan03884]

TAB is a notorious anti CCW asshat. He shoots and likes guns but he hates the idea of people taking responsibility for their own safety. He has drank to much of the Ca BS Kool aide.

[TAB]

TAB is a notorious anti CCW asshat. He shoots and likes guns but he hates the idea of people taking responsibility for their own safety. He has drank to much of the Ca BS Kool aide.

I am anything but anti CCW... I just think employers have the right to restrict things coming to thier place of biz...  I also beleave in things like the tx 30.06 law.   Where a sign, clearly in view, with in the templet the law provides is the same thing as a verbal warning and going past it is a crime.  if there is no punishment, there is no reason to obey the law.

I also don't think getting a CCW should be as simple as filling out a form and paying a fee.   There needs to be training and  demostrating you can safely operate a fire arm.   Then again I am also of the mind that if you have a ND, you lose your CCW as you just proved you can not safely handle a firearm.

[tombogan03884]

I am anything but anti CCW... I just think employers have the right to restrict things coming to thier place of biz...  I also beleave in things like the tx 30.06 law.   Where a sign, clearly in view, with in the templet the law provides is the same thing as a verbal warning and going past it is a crime.  if there is no punishment, there is no reason to obey the law.

I also don't think getting a CCW should be as simple as filling out a form and paying a fee.   There needs to be training and  demostrating you can safely operate a fire arm.   Then again I am also of the mind that if you have a ND, you lose your CCW as you just proved you can not safely handle a firearm.

Do I need to do the quotes from your previous posts thing AGAIN, crap, this is starting to be an annoying habit. OK heres a couple;
While not specicly CCW related it's a gem.

 Reply Reply with quote  Notify of replies
1963     Member Section / Down Range Cafe / Re: Concerning the Second Amendment    on: 03 January 2008, 15:39:03
Now as far as the coment about its the gun graber throwing the mud, you are way off base.  Its the  US Constitution itself that has made it unclear.  The US cons is a Living document, being a living document is it up for interpretation.  Lets just take the 1st ammendment.( since its less "polarizing" then the 2a.... remember the US cons is not A La Carte, if it applys to one part it applys to all.)

1964       Member Section / Down Range Cafe / Re: Concerning the Second Amendment       on: 03 January 2008, 06:30:57
the 2a is about as clear as mud.   Even if it was made crystal clear( thru say an amendment to change the text), the supreme court would still be the only group that would be able to tell us what it means.  Which I am hoping they will do this year.

If you take in for the "1700" interpretation( of which there are several "versions") there is still alot of grey areas.

1761       Member Section / Politics & RKBA / Re: Ted Nugent on gun control, the police, and Ted Kennedy       on: 25 May 2008, 19:52:12
n many ways I resepect The nuggee...  when it comes to his stance on CCW I DO NOT RECPECT HIM.  Not for where he stands, but his applcation of where he stands... IE he is a "full time LEO" which I call BS on.

This one is a classic
1734       Member Section / Down Range Cafe / Re: Zero Intelligence - Man with picture of fake gun on T- shirt not allowed to fly       on: 03 June 2008, 15:53:08
I'm all for our basic rights( free speach... yadda yadda yadda)

Airlines are a business, and as a business, they can choose who they want to do business with.

Don't like that idea... I hate to pop your cherry when it comes to the real world, but that is how the world works.

Its late and I'm sick of reading through TABS old posts