Something for the Quaker....

[ericire12]

http://www.iamsorryivotedforobama.com/

[fightingquaker13]

Thanks Eric, my very own thread! Actually I don't disagree with most of the posts.
FQ13 who still wouldn't have voted for McCain but does have buyer's remorse

[tombogan03884]

 I posted a "We told you so", with the comment that , all they needed to do was a lttle research, his entire LIFE has revolved around socialists and criminals of various types. Maybe next time they will listen, or at least check the facts of the people who say your messiah is a sleaze ball.

[fullautovalmet76]

Thanks Eric, my very own thread! Actually I don't disagree with most of the posts.
FQ13 who still wouldn't have voted for McCain but does have buyer's remorse

Quaker,
Did you really vote for Obama or were you really voting against Sarah Palin?

[fightingquaker13]

Quaker,
Did you really vote for Obama or were you really voting against Sarah Palin?

You know me too well Fullauto, but Palin was just the insult to the injury. I don't know if you read David Brooks' or Kathleen Parker's columns, but they pretty much have said every thing I have to say about Palin. It was mostly a vote against the party in power who had FUBARED  the practical stuff and dangerously enhanced the power of the executive branch and topped that with an anti-choice, anti-free speech (McCain-Feingold) candidate at the the top of the ticket. I didn't vote FOR Obama. I voted no. I was telling the GOP to take four years off and get an attitude adjustment. You don't reward failure, yet either way, it seems, you lose. Se la guerre.
FQ13

[Sponsor]

[tombogan03884]

You know me too well Fullauto, but Palin was just the insult to the injury. I don't know if you read David Brooks' or Kathleen Parker's columns, but they pretty much have said every thing I have to say about Palin. It was mostly a vote against the party in power who had FUBARED  the practical stuff and dangerously enhanced the power of the executive branch and topped that with an anti-choice, anti-free speech (McCain-Feingold) candidate at the the top of the ticket. I didn't vote FOR Obama. I voted no. I was telling the GOP to take four years off and get an attitude adjustment. You don't reward failure, yet either way, it seems, you lose. Se la guerre.
FQ13

Now maybe you will come to understand that even if he was wishy washy, W did pretty damn good considering he was following Clinton and saddled with an anti American Congress for 6 of 8 years as well as the communist media, both of whom where actively working against America. and dealing with the results of Barney Frank and Maxine Waters actions under Clinton.
As for Palin, Your either going to change your tune or look dumb again.

[fullautovalmet76]

You know me too well Fullauto, but Palin was just the insult to the injury. I don't know if you read David Brooks' or Kathleen Parker's columns, but they pretty much have said every thing I have to say about Palin. It was mostly a vote against the party in power who had FUBARED  the practical stuff and dangerously enhanced the power of the executive branch and topped that with an anti-choice, anti-free speech (McCain-Feingold) candidate at the the top of the ticket. I didn't vote FOR Obama. I voted no. I was telling the GOP to take four years off and get an attitude adjustment. You don't reward failure, yet either way, it seems, you lose. Se la guerre.
FQ13

Not to start a debate about Palin here, but I wonder how you reconcile your views about her as a political candidate with those you have about Feminism. From my point of view you have a contradiction, but then again, you and I haven't had that debate over a few (ah hell let's try cases) of beer, which I think I would truly learn alot from that exchange...... 

[tombogan03884]

Not to start a debate about Palin here, but I wonder how you reconcile your views about her as a political candidate with those you have about Feminism. From my point of view you have a contradiction, but then again, you and I haven't had that debate over a few (ah hell let's try cases) of beer, which I think I would truly learn alot from that exchange...... 

He got you there FQ, I'm the one that posted women didn't belong in politics and I support her, you are the "libertarian" Pro Choice etc. etc. and you hate her worse than the dems hated Bush. Could it be that you are only pro choice if it's the one you agree with ? Everything the dems have said for the last 8 years has been proven to be lies as far as the economy, war, health care, and BO are concerned, but you still cling to their sexist hatred of Palin. That is just as hypocritical as the Dems spokesman during the McCarthy hearings, a flaming homosexual, accusing Joe and his witnesses of being queers.
By the way, in case you missed the other thread, I got the name of the book wrong, it's "the Sword and The Shield" By Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin, published by Basic Books. But Anne Coulters Treason covers just the American aspects McCarthy, Hiss/Chambers etc in half as many pages.

[fullautovalmet76]

He got you there FQ, I'm the one that posted women didn't belong in politics and I support her, you are the "libertarian" Pro Choice etc. etc. and you hate her worse than the dems hated Bush. Could it be that you are only pro choice if it's the one you agree with ? Everything the dems have said for the last 8 years has been proven to be lies as far as the economy, war, health care, and BO are concerned, but you still cling to their sexist hatred of Palin. That is just as hypocritical as the Dems spokesman during the McCarthy hearings, a flaming homosexual, accusing Joe and his witnesses of being queers.
By the way, in case you missed the other thread, I got the name of the book wrong, it's "the Sword and The Shield" By Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin, published by Basic Books. But Anne Coulters Treason covers just the American aspects McCarthy, Hiss/Chambers etc in half as many pages.

Tom,
If Quaker and I ever square off in a debate, I may need your number in case I need to slice through the fog of his rhetoric..... 

[fightingquaker13]

He got you there FQ, I'm the one that posted women didn't belong in politics and I support her, you are the "libertarian" Pro Choice etc. etc. and you hate her worse than the dems hated Bush. Could it be that you are only pro choice if it's the one you agree with ? Everything the dems have said for the last 8 years has been proven to be lies as far as the economy, war, health care, and BO are concerned, but you still cling to their sexist hatred of Palin. That is just as hypocritical as the Dems spokesman during the McCarthy hearings, a flaming homosexual, accusing Joe and his witnesses of being queers.
By the way, in case you missed the other thread, I got the name of the book wrong, it's "the Sword and The Shield" By Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin, published by Basic Books. But Anne Coulters Treason covers just the American aspects McCarthy, Hiss/Chambers etc in half as many pages.

Why is hating Palin sexist? Does hating BO make you racist? I show my respect to her by disliking her for her positions and her "I'm ignorant and proud of it" as opposed to "there are things I need to learn more about and I will" attitude. She is the anti-Kerry. I loathed Kerry, and Romney (do they put something in the water in Ma.?) for their smug elitist view. Palin was the same, only it was twisted into a version that said a small town mayor knew everything it took to lead the free world. Same disease, different symptoms. Gender had nothing to do with it. Its just that simple. BTW, if she was so great why didn't she finish her term as governor? This isn't a strictly anti-Palin shot either. I say the same to my (blessedly) soon to be ex-senator Mel Martinez. You told the voters you would do the job for x years and then you bail without extenuating circumstances? Since when is that leadership? In the military its called UA. For the record, I cordially despise Hillary and Pelosi as well.
FQ13