State Run Media Attempts Divide & Conquer Manuever With Gun Owners.

[twyacht]

Someone stated that an armed society, is a polite society.

It's a shame the anti's want to make it one sided, in favor of the criminals that could care less about gun control..

[tombogan03884]

 Had to send Armed American Radio another nastygram on open carry :

This is my second comment on “Open Carry”. You are dead wrong about playing the PC game about not offending the anti’s by open carrying.
We have been walking on eggshells around these people for 40 years and we have gone from being limited on machine gun purchases to having every gun purchase approved by the FBI, and having to fight for the very existence of our very right.
Take a lesson from the Gay rights movement. “Out of the Closet, and into the Streets”. 40 years ago being gay was a criminal offense, if a reporter said that some one was a homosexual their employer was going to get sued and they WOULD wind up paying. Using the courts and polite, non offensive tactics did not work for them. After 30 years of “We’re here, We’re queer” gay rights parades they are allowed to marry in some states. Obviously the in your face, we are not changing approach WORKED.
By trying not to offend, not scare the old ladies, we are playing into the anti’s agenda.
The more effective approach is NOT to be apologetic about exercising your civil rights.
The proper approach is “I’m armed. I’m staying armed. Any one who objects can KMA.

[tt11758]

Had to send Armed American Radio another nastygram on open carry :

This is my second comment on “Open Carry”. You are dead wrong about playing the PC game about not offending the anti’s by open carrying.
We have been walking on eggshells around these people for 40 years and we have gone from being limited on machine gun purchases to having every gun purchase approved by the FBI, and having to fight for the very existence of our very right.
Take a lesson from the Gay rights movement. “Out of the Closet, and into the Streets”. 40 years ago being gay was a criminal offense, if a reporter said that some one was a homosexual their employer was going to get sued and they WOULD wind up paying. Using the courts and polite, non offensive tactics did not work for them. After 30 years of “We’re here, We’re queer” gay rights parades they are allowed to marry in some states. Obviously the in your face, we are not changing approach WORKED.
By trying not to offend, not scare the old ladies, we are playing into the anti’s agenda.
The more effective approach is NOT to be apologetic about exercising your civil rights.
The proper approach is “I’m a law-abiding citizen who happens to be armed. I’m a law-abiding citizen who plans on staying armed. Any one who objects can KMA.

Edited to differentiate us from the BG's.   

[Woody]

And there was no mass killings or anything. Oh, if they could of just taped a real live killing what journalist feat that would of been. Instead everybody was safe and secure. But wait that's not logical, all those deadly evil guns everywhere