Author Topic: AR Kaboom  (Read 5191 times)

fightingquaker13

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11894
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: AR Kaboom
« Reply #20 on: August 27, 2009, 10:36:23 PM »
how hard can it be to tech someone this?

Tap, rack bang.

there aint no "smack the FA and then pull the charging handle"
Indeed. SPORTS (Slap, Pull, Observe, Release, Tap, Shoot). Live it, learn it, love it. I do not remember being taught to to rack the handle then randomly hit the FA like a monkey on speed.
FQ13 ::)

Badgersmilk

  • Guest
Re: AR Kaboom
« Reply #21 on: August 28, 2009, 07:26:17 AM »
I'm guessing this guy learned to shoot from the same late night movie.



You see the idea here is to prove how tough you are!

You know, when a hot case pops up in the air, hits you in the eye, then goes down your shirt.  :o  You just grin and say.  "Yeah!  That's how I roll!" ;D


Ocin

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 210
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: AR Kaboom
« Reply #22 on: August 31, 2009, 09:18:46 AM »
I have been told that there are (minimal) differences between .223 Rem. and 5.56 Nato ammo, resulting in 5.56 Nato rounds possibly not chambering properly in a rifle chambered for .223 Rem. This is apparently the result of different production standards being used for .223 Rem. (Saami specifications) and 5.56 Nato (European specifications). Also, as a result of these differences in specifications 5.56 Nato may result in higher peak pressures.

Could this have been the cause of this failure?

Ocin
Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest.
Gandhi, An Autobiography, p. 446 (Beacon Press paperback edition)

ericire12

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7926
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: AR Kaboom
« Reply #23 on: August 31, 2009, 09:20:19 AM »
I have been told that there are (minimal) differences between .223 Rem. and 5.56 Nato ammo, resulting in 5.56 Nato rounds possibly not chambering properly in a rifle chambered for .223 Rem. This is apparently the result of different production standards being used for .223 Rem. (Saami specifications) and 5.56 Nato (European specifications). Also, as a result of these differences in specifications 5.56 Nato may result in higher peak pressures.

Could this have been the cause of this failure?

Ocin

5.56 is a hotter round and can cause a rupture in a .223 chamber.

.223 is safe to fire in a 5.56 chamber, but not the other way around.
Everything I needed to learn in life I learned from Country Music.

ericire12

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7926
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: AR Kaboom
« Reply #24 on: August 31, 2009, 09:22:03 AM »
I'm guessing this guy learned to shoot from the same late night movie.



You see the idea here is to prove how tough you are!

You know, when a hot case pops up in the air, hits you in the eye, then goes down your shirt.  :o  You just grin and say.  "Yeah!  That's how I roll!" ;D



If you look closer, the gun is not into battery. The round never fully chambered.

Exit question: name that gun!
Everything I needed to learn in life I learned from Country Music.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: AR Kaboom
« Reply #25 on: Today at 03:25:09 AM »

Timothy

  • Guest
Re: AR Kaboom
« Reply #25 on: August 31, 2009, 10:25:21 AM »
If you look closer, the gun is not into battery. The round never fully chambered.

Exit question: name that gun!

G-26

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk