Charlie Rangel hides income and assets.

[Ichiban]

I know - shocking, aint it?   
A commoner would go to jail for this.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203706604574376720192072820.html
The Absent-Minded Chairman
Charlie Rangel wins the personal lottery.

When normal people happen to "find" their own money, it might mean a twenty left in a winter coat, or discovering change beneath the sofa cushions. But if you're Charlie Rangel, it means doubling your net worth.

Earlier this month the Chairman of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee "amended" his 2007 financial disclosure form—to the tune of more than a half-million dollars in previously unreported assets and income. That number may be as high as $780,000, because Congress's ethics rules only require the Members to report their finances within broad ranges. This voyage of personal financial discovery brings Mr. Rangel's net worth for 2007 to somewhere between $1.028 million and $2.495 million, while his previous statement came in at $516,015 and $1.316 million.

When you're a powerful Congressman and working diligently to increase tax rates to pay for President Obama's health-care plan, we suppose it's easy to lose track of one of your checking accounts. That would be the one at the federal credit union with a balance somewhere between $250,001 and maybe as high as $500,000. And when you're crunched for time and pulling together bills to pass in a rush, we guess, too, that you might overlook several other investment accounts, even if some of them are sizable, such as the ones Mr. Rangel missed at JP Morgan, Merrill Lynch, Oppenheimer and BlackRock.

Oh, and those vacant properties in Glassboro, in southern Jersey? Everybody in Manhattan tries not to think much about New Jersey, so those lots and their as-much-as-$15,000 value must also have slipped down the memory hole. (The New York Post reported yesterday that Mr. Rangel failed to pay property taxes for two of the lots, according to the county clerk's office.)

The Chairman probably isn't doing a lot of dining at KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell or Long John Silver's, either, which may explain why he didn't disclose the $1,001 to $15,000 in stock he owns in Yum Brands, the conglomerate that runs those chain restaurants. Compared to his undisclosed portfolio stake in PepsiCo—$15,001 to $50,000—that's practically a rounding error.

All lawmakers amend their financial reports from time to time, though rarely are the errors this extensive. Via email, a Rangel spokesman declined to offer details about how the errors occurred, noting that "Once the Ethics Committee completes its work, then we can answer questions in more detail." He added that Mr. Rangel is now "confident that his records have been subjected to an exhaustive and complete review, and that the amendments accurately reflect his financial interests."

Among other issues, Mr. Rangel is currently under investigation regarding his use of four rent-stabilized apartments at New York City's tony Lenox Terrace and soliciting donations with his official letterhead for the Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service at City College of New York, which was itself built with a $1.9 million earmark. Yet another part of the probe is his failure to report $75,000 in income from a rental villa at the beachfront Punta Cana Yacht Club, in the Dominican Republic.

Mr. Rangel blamed that last one on the language barrier because he doesn't speak Spanish. We can only imagine what language he speaks with his accountants and tax attorneys.

[tombogan03884]

They only do that if they think their going to get caught. Rangel probably is afraid his POed constituents might start digging.

[twyacht]

Let alone Barney Frank, who already is an a** digger,...of the same ilk....

All of them.. They have got to go....

[tt11758]

Let alone Barney Frank, who already is an a** digger,...of the same ilk....

All of them.. They have got to go....

I agree.  The only problem is that MOST people seem to think "they all have to go.....except mine."

[twyacht]

I agree.  The only problem is that MOST people seem to think "they all have to go.....except mine."

That is quickly changing.....


57% Would Like to Replace Entire Congress
Sunday, August 30, 2009
Email a Friend Email to a Friend ShareThis
Advertisement
Quantcast

If they could vote to keep or replace the entire Congress, just 25% of voters nationwide would keep the current batch of legislators.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 57% would vote to replace the entire Congress and start all over again. Eighteen percent (18%) are not sure how they would vote.

That's more than half and a number that needs to keep going up.

INCUMBENTS NEED TO GO!!

IT"S TIME FOR A DO OVER!!!

[Sponsor]

[Rastus]

Something to keep in mind, as a rule, these guys are not here to serve...but to serve.

Things begin to make more sense when you accept that fact and observe their actions as a chess game that, perhaps, has an ending that is not what it seems.