Obama is a Narcissistic Nut Case

[Teresa Heilevang]

passing this on from my buddy~~ 



Slowly, and I mean slowly, Americans are beginning to notice Obama's elevated opinion of himself.  There's nothing new about narcissism in politics.   Every senator looks in the mirror and sees a president.  Nonetheless, has there ever been a president with a wider gap between his estimation of himself and the sum total of his lifetime achievements?  I think NOT!  Obama started out as a below average community organizer, tied to ACORN and a host of abominable creeps, a former Illinois state senator who voted "present" nearly 130 times, was a three-year senator without a single important legislative achievement to his name.  As president of the Harvard Law Review, as law professor and as legislator, he never produced a single notable piece of scholarship!  Never written a single memorable article!  His most memorable work is a biography of his favorite subject: HIMSELF!!!  The poor fool is nothing but a narcissistic con man, hoping to create the largest Ponzi scheme in history within Politics.... and he's will on his way of making it happen while the poor suckers, (the American people), stand by and let it happen!   
 
In the words of his own slogan, "we are the ones we've been waiting for," which, translating the royal "we," means: " I am the one we've been waiting for."  Amazingly, when running for president he had a quasi-presidential seal with its own Latin inscription affixed to his lectern, until general ridicule -- it was pointed out that he was not yet president -- induced him to take it down.
 
He lectures us that instead of worrying about immigrants learning English, "you need to make sure your child can speak Spanish" -- a language Obama does not speak!  He further admonishes us on how "embarrassing it is that Europeans are multilingual but we go over to Europe, and all we can say is 'merci beaucoup.' "  Obama speaks no French!
 
For the first few months of his campaign, the question about Obama was: Who is he?  The question now is: Who in the hell does he think he is?  Man, are we getting to know.  Redeemer of our uninvolved, uninformed lives.  Lord of the seas.  And more.  As he said on victory night, "his rise marks the moment when our planet began to heal."  As I recall, Jesus practiced his healing just on the sick.  Obama operates on a hell of a larger canvas.
 
The fact that Obama is a total incognito with zero accomplishment, makes this inexplicable infatuation alarming.  Obama is not an ordinary man.  He is not a genius.  In fact he is quite ignorant on MOST important subjects.  It makes one wonder just who in the hell is running this country?  Barack Obama is a narcissist, pure and simple.
 
Dr. Sam Vaknin, the author of the ‘Malignant Self Love,’ also believes, “Barack Obama appears to be a narcissist.”  Vaknin is a world authority on narcissism.  He understands narcissism and describes the inner mind of a narcissist like no other person.  When the doctor talks about narcissism everyone listens.  Vaknin says that Obama’s language, posture and demeanor, and the testimonies of his closest, dearest and nearest suggest that Obama is either a pure narcissist or he has a narcissistic personality disorder (NPD).
 
According to Vaknin, "Narcissists project a grandiose but false image of themselves.  Jim Jones, the charismatic leader of People’s Temple, the man who led over 900 of his followers to cheerfully commit mass suicide and even murder their own children was also a narcissist.  David Koresh, Charles Manson, Joseph Koni, Shoko Asahara, Stalin, Saddam, Mao, Kim Jong Ill and Adolph Hitler are a few examples of narcissists of our time.  All these men had a tremendous influence over their followers.  They created a personality cult around themselves and with their blazing speeches elevated their admirers’ souls, filled their hearts with enthusiasm and instilled in their minds a new zest for life.  They gave them 'HOPE!'  They gave them 'CHANGE.'  They promised them the moon, but alas, invariably they brought them to their own doom. When you are a victim of a cult of personality, you don’t know it until it is too late."

I guess you can say that I'm quite pissed in the way this narcissistic blow-hard, Barack Hussein Obama, is slowly turning this NATION into a second class "has-been."

   ....Warph

[alfsauve]

Don't know when Warph wrote this but definitely not the first to make the diagnosis.  Here's some more articles.

Robert Bowie Johnson, Jr   September 2008
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/obama_oprah_and_the_guru_malig_1.html

Sam Vaknin, Ph.D. March 2009
http://bsimmons.wordpress.com/2009/03/12/barack-obama-narcissist-or-merely-narcissistic-2/

Also written about by David Limbaugh & Charles Krauthammer and many others in the last year.

[Pathfinder]

bho is exactly that, as well as not the brightest bulb in the pack. Of course, that is his most endearing quality to his handlers - they want him running rampant, they want him doing as much damage to the US as possible with his ill-thought, misguided, and just flat-out wrong ideas. It's what they want, so they are happy with his actions.

BTW, anyone see the Canadian news report (not run in the US MSM of course) in which bho was taken to task by Sarkozy? "Obama: “We must never stop until we see the day when nuclear arms have been banished from the face of the earth.”

    Sarkozy: “We live in the real world, not the virtual world. And the real world expects us to take decisions.”

The rest of Sarkozy’s remarks were, well, remarkable:

    “President Obama dreams of a world without weapons … but right in front of us two countries are doing the exact opposite.

    “Iran since 2005 has flouted five security council resolutions. North Korea has been defying council resolutions since 1993.

    “I support the extended hand of the Americans, but what good has proposals for dialogue brought the international community? More uranium enrichment and declarations by the leaders of Iran to wipe a UN member state off the map,” he continued, referring to Israel.

The sharp-tongued French leader even implied that Mr Obama’s resolution 1887 had used up valuable diplomatic energy.

    “If we have courage to impose sanctions together it will lend viability to our commitment to reduce our own weapons and to making a world without nuke weapons,” he said.

Mr Sarkozy has previously called the US president’s disarmament crusade “naive.”

http://biggovernment.com/2009/09/25/sarkozy-mocks-obama-at-un-security-council-hello-big-media/

[tombogan03884]

bho is exactly that, as well as not the brightest bulb in the pack. Of course, that is his most endearing quality to his handlers - they want him running rampant, they want him doing as much damage to the US as possible with his ill-thought, misguided, and just flat-out wrong ideas. It's what they want, so they are happy with his actions.

BTW, anyone see the Canadian news report (not run in the US MSM of course) in which bho was taken to task by Sarkozy? "Obama: “We must never stop until we see the day when nuclear arms have been banished from the face of the earth.”

    Sarkozy: “We live in the real world, not the virtual world. And the real world expects us to take decisions.”

The rest of Sarkozy’s remarks were, well, remarkable:

    “President Obama dreams of a world without weapons … but right in front of us two countries are doing the exact opposite.

    “Iran since 2005 has flouted five security council resolutions. North Korea has been defying council resolutions since 1993.

    “I support the extended hand of the Americans, but what good has proposals for dialogue brought the international community? More uranium enrichment and declarations by the leaders of Iran to wipe a UN member state off the map,” he continued, referring to Israel.

The sharp-tongued French leader even implied that Mr Obama’s resolution 1887 had used up valuable diplomatic energy.

    “If we have courage to impose sanctions together it will lend viability to our commitment to reduce our own weapons and to making a world without nuke weapons,” he said.

Mr Sarkozy has previously called the US president’s disarmament crusade “naive.”

http://biggovernment.com/2009/09/25/sarkozy-mocks-obama-at-un-security-council-hello-big-media/

 I never dreamed I would live to see the day when I had to say the FRENCH President was right and an American "President" was a putz. They should trade places.    

[tt11758]

I never dreamed I would live to see the day when I had to say the FRENCH President was right and an American "President" was a putz. They should trade places.   

The world is upside down.



The first thought that popped into my mind when I read the headline to this post was, "WELL, DUH!!!"     

[Sponsor]

[alfsauve]

I never dreamed I would live to see the day when I had to say the FRENCH President was right and an American "President" was a putz. They should trade places.    

Who knows, one day I might be able to fly the French flag again with pride.

[fightingquaker13]

Who knows, one day I might be able to fly the French flag again with pride.

I have always loved France BUT with the caveat that they (like the Italians) should stick to food, wine, art and beautiful women, avoiding politics and the military like the plague because that never ends well for them. Here I must adjust my assesment. Sarkozy is a realist. Something we have not seen in office since Bush the elder was defeated. We have had an idiot (Clinton) and two idealists, though from opposite ends of the spectrum (W and BO) and none of them have done a damn thing effective in FP. Look at the last unabashed realist, Henry Kissinger and the women he used to date. Look at Sarkozy and the woman he is married to. Both played far, far out of their leagues and succeeded. There may be something about being a realist. Just sayin'....
FQ13

[tombogan03884]

OK time to tear up FQ, ( Hey, I need SOMETHING for a hobby    )
"I have always loved France BUT with the caveat that they (like the Italians) should stick to food, wine, art and beautiful women"
While Italy may not have much to brag about over the last 1500 years, at least they never lost to Mexico. And they DID beat Ethiopia.
"We have had an idiot (Clinton)"
Believe it or not, I don't really think BJ was an idiot, He strikes me more as an honestly corrupt politician who went were the winds of pay offs blew.
"two idealists, though from opposite ends of the spectrum (W and BO)"
The problem with W was that he was NOT at the opposite end of the spectrum, even when he had a Rep. majority the first 2 years he was to eager to "build consensus" both with the Dems, and with the rest of the world. Even though every "realist" in both parties knew that the Dems, regardless of what was best for the country, would f-ck him every chance they got he still felt it necessary to  suck up to them. After 9-11 he should have reacted the same day and to hell with world opinion, ( which was almost universally on our side until the media and politicians managed to twist it to suit their own purposes).

[fightingquaker13]

OK time to tear up FQ, ( Hey, I need SOMETHING for a hobby    )
"I have always loved France BUT with the caveat that they (like the Italians) should stick to food, wine, art and beautiful women"
While Italy may not have much to brag about over the last 1500 years, at least they never lost to Mexico. And they DID beat Ethiopia.
"We have had an idiot (Clinton)"
Believe it or not, I don't really think BJ was an idiot, He strikes me more as an honestly corrupt politician who went were the winds of pay offs blew.
"two idealists, though from opposite ends of the spectrum (W and BO)"
The problem with W was that he was NOT at the opposite end of the spectrum, even when he had a Rep. majority the first 2 years he was to eager to "build consensus" both with the Dems, and with the rest of the world. Even though every "realist" in both parties knew that the Dems, regardless of what was best for the country, would f-ck him every chance they got he still felt it necessary to  suck up to them. After 9-11 he should have reacted the same day and to hell with world opinion, ( which was almost universally on our side until the media and politicians managed to twist it to suit their own purposes).

OK time to tear up Tom, because like he said, its a hobby. Thing is, I'm better at it, at least in this case.
Three points
1) The Italians never lost to Mexico and beat Ethiopia?  (I'm sure they have a parade for that one) Well, news flash we are losing to Mexico every damn day if you look at the invasion of illegals and drugs that come across our borders. The Soviets thought we could hold the Fulda gap when we don't have the will to defend the Rio Grande? Its not the French that lack (and yes this is piling on, but it is Tom  ) cojones here, its us. As far as the Ethiopians, the Italians had to use nerve gas to defeat them They had an army where a WW1 mauser and a freaking SPEAR were standard issue. Their guys fought barefoot which is why the nerve gas was effective.

2 Clinton was not an idiot? He came in to power when the USSR was defeated, the Chinese were weak and the EU was just getting started. America was never in a stronger position since 1945. Truman remade the world to suit our interests under those circumstances. What did Cinton do? Ended a civil war in Balkans and got our asses kicked by the Somalis and failed to deal with Iran after the Khobar Towers before they had  nukes and people were still afraid of us? Oh yeah, there was that Sudanese offer to extadite Bin Laden. Oops! But hey, we did get NAFTA.

3 W wasn't an idealist? He and Jimmy Carter, and BO were seperated at birth. All three believe that inside every foriegner there is a good American just waiting to get out. Give the Afghans a chance and Jeffersonian Democracy will spring from the ground like mushrooms. Democracy can be exported and its racist and wrong to say it won't work in a conservative muslim society. Girls will go to school  (pay no mind to those folks throwing battery acid in their faces, they'll come around after we bomb a few more villages (W) or just sit down and talk about it (BO)). The thing is they thought we can change hearts and minds. We can't. We can just defeat our enemies physically and set the terms for a truce, we can never set the political culture of another country. Maybe, in defeat, they will emulate ours as they might think that maybe they can learn something from the guys that6 just kicked their butts. This was the case with Germany and Japan. Maybe they won't, as is the case with Russia. Either way its stupid to try as you can't force a free society on anyone, you either want it or you don't, which is what W and BO have yet to undertand.
FQ13

[tombogan03884]

I'm going to insert my comments into FQ's post in order to keep from wandering off on a tangent  

OK time to tear up Tom, because like he said, its a hobby. Thing is, I'm better at it, at least in this case.
Three points
1) The Italians never lost to Mexico and beat Ethiopia?  (I'm sure they have a parade for that one) Well, news flash we are losing to Mexico every damn day if you look at the invasion of illegals and drugs that come across our borders. The Soviets thought we could hold the Fulda gap when we don't have the will to defend the Rio Grande? Its not the French that lack (and yes this is piling on, but it is Tom  ) cojones here, its us. As far as the Ethiopians, the Italians had to use nerve gas to defeat them They had an army where a WW1 mauser and a freaking SPEAR were standard issue. Their guys fought barefoot which is why the nerve gas was effective.
About Mexico, you can't lose a war you refuse to acknowledge, but you CAN, as Russia and China have done several times, simply absorb the invaders. which seems to be the tactic preferred by Congress. When it comes right down to it When I was out in Ca. I liked the Mexicans I worked with a heck of a lot better than the in laws I lived with.
About Ethiopia, I would not short change the Italians on that one, yes they may have embarrassed themselves against Europeans later but think about this. Those "barefoot tribesmen" KNEW the country side like you know YOUR neighborhood, granted they were armed with swords, spears, and old rifles, but these were tough determined men, grandsons of Kiplings "Fuzzy Wuzzy's" who were the only natives to ever "Break a British square". The descendants of the Mahdi's Dervishes were fighting men to match any in the world. (I realize the the fighting against the Mahdi took place further west around Khartoum but they are the same people and he recruited over the entire region.)

2 Clinton was not an idiot? He came in to power when the USSR was defeated, the Chinese were weak and the EU was just getting started. America was never in a stronger position since 1945. Truman remade the world to suit our interests under those circumstances. What did Cinton do? Ended a civil war in Balkans and got our asses kicked by the Somalis and failed to deal with Iran after the Khobar Towers before they had  nukes and people were still afraid of us? Oh yeah, there was that Sudanese offer to extadite Bin Laden. Oops! But hey, we did get NAFTA.
God, I can believe I'm actually defended this meathead    Just because Clinton's FP decisions don't make sense to you doesn't mean HE is an idiot (in this case ) it just means you are not looking at it from the right perspective. Having met the man my opinion of him is that he wants every one to like him, he loved the attention of being President, that is why every step he took was poll determined (after all, his home life must have been a ball    )  Take a careful look at his FP  Bosnia and Kosovo, limited ground involvement just bombing them from 10,000 feet, minimal risk. Somalia, We did NOT get beat, the troops we had there UNDER UN COMMAND, were pulled out when it looked light our involvement might actually hurt Bill's popularity, not for any military or strategic reason, ( NOTE, It was ONLY the Rangers under UN command, which decided to take sides that faced major hostility from the Somali people, the Marines, under US command who had previously remained neutral and simply administered the Aid programs had few problems at all. The fact that Aidids son was a Corporal may have  had some influence on that )

3 W wasn't an idealist? He and Jimmy Carter, and BO were seperated at birth. All three believe that inside every foriegner there is a good American just waiting to get out. Give the Afghans a chance and Jeffersonian Democracy will spring from the ground like mushrooms. Democracy can be exported and its racist and wrong to say it won't work in a conservative muslim society. Girls will go to school  (pay no mind to those folks throwing battery acid in their faces, they'll come around after we bomb a few more villages (W) or just sit down and talk about it (BO)). The thing is they thought we can change hearts and minds. We can't. We can just defeat our enemies physically and set the terms for a truce, we can never set the political culture of another country. Maybe, in defeat, they will emulate ours as they might think that maybe they can learn something from the guys that6 just kicked their butts. This was the case with Germany and Japan. Maybe they won't, as is the case with Russia. Either way its stupid to try as you can't force a free society on anyone, you either want it or you don't, which is what W and BO have yet to undertand.
I was not saying that W was not an idealist, simple that it was the idealism of mediocrity, rather than being as you had posted, the opposite end of the spectrum from BO, a raving communist, and only angering some of the population, W entrenched himself in the middle of the road and p!ssed off EVERYONE to one extent or another. While the leftists media and liberals may have seen him as another Hitler many of the rest of us thought of more in the vein of Charlie Brown.
FQ13

You THINK your better at it.  HA    
I fart loudly in your direction