Glock owner, but not really a fan. I like Glocks, but I consider it a working gun. That means I carry it and if it gets mangled or lost, I'm not going to get upset. I consider the Glock to be just one part of the expense of personal defense.
I am a fan of 1911s...but I don't own one. I love how they look, feel and handle (I really liked someone's bald Caspian...there was NOTHING on the slide other than rear serrations and sights). However, my experience with 1911's have been bad. Part of it is my self-defense focus; for competition I would have to have one. Gunsmith tuned 1911's are the reality of today's competitive environment. Yes, there are some exceptions to this.
When people complain about how the index of the Glock is high, my main question is: "What are you using it for?" If the answer is "defense", then the next question is: "What is the context of the fight for which you are training?" Close, personal confrontations do NOT require one inch at 25 yard accuracy. The goblin is not going to notice the difference when you shoot him to the ground. If it points a tad high...so what? Surround the gun with his body and pull the trigger! There won't be time to get a good sight picture. There will be even less time if you're in contact with the goblin, then it turns into desperations shots to *any* available body part. Is the Les Baer accuracy guarantee even needed? Of course not...for those situations.
Put handgun precision and accuracy in its place: the gun range. Determine the level needed for the application and set your expectations accordingly.