Smoke medical Pot; lose your CCW

[Timothy]

All in all I'd rather be around armed stoner's than armed drunks.
Drunks are unpredictable where as a stoner is more likely to tell you to have some cookies and chill.  

Does anyone have any milk?    

Exactly!  I have extensive experience in both vices and I must agree with Tom.  A person whos a bit stoned can be reasoned with whereas, most drunks are just, well.......assholes!

Myself?  I was a happy drunk, WAY TOO HAPPY!

[Walter45Auto]

The drunks I know who are assholes when drunk, are usually not much better when sober. 

[fightingquaker13]

The drunks I know who are assholes when drunk, are usually not much better when sober. 

Its like that old Bill Cosby skit.
He asks a coke head "What's the attraction with coke"?
Stoner replies, "It intensifies you personality man"!
Cosby responds, "But what if you're an asshole"?
FQ13

[tt11758]

What about 15 feet? Its a more realistic SD distance. The the thing is that the elderly, the weak, the halt (what does that mean anyway) and the lame are more likely to need a gun than those who are healthy and strong. They will be targeted by scumbags looking for an easy score and have nothing to fall back on if they have no weapon. Back in high school I smoked my share, and probaly yours, of he demon weed. It did not effect me the next day. I was able to drive, mow the lawns I mowed for money, and operate a boat without that "Oh crap I'm stoned/drunk and should not be doing this" feeling I got exactly once before making a life long promise to myself that I would always have Taxi money if I was going to drink. The point is, I think you might have watched "Reefer Madness" one too many times. Someone who smokes a joint at 5pm so they will have an appetite for dinner at 7pm despite the chemo is not a threat to themselves and others the next day.
FQ13

It MIGHT have negatively affected you last November, however.   

[tombogan03884]

Even if you drive to the polls drunk, NEVER EVER VOTE UNDER THE INFLUENCE 

[Sponsor]

[GUNS-R-US]

This is pure BS. Using a drug and carrying does not mean being under the influence and carrying. Its like saying because you drink alchohol or take some medication tht makes you drowsy, you can't have a gun. No one is arguing that you should be able to carry while inebrieated. Simply that if you indulge, legally in your own home, that should not keep you from carrying the next day when you are not under the influence.
FQ13

That's exactly how I feel about the subject to! Alcoholics can have permits, so why not MJ users? Most are not stoned every minute of the day any more than the Alcoholics are drunk every minute of the day! After all we are discussing people using MJ LEGALLY!

[tombogan03884]

That's exactly how I feel about the subject to! Alcoholics can have permits, so why not MJ users? Most are not stoned every minute of the day any more than the Alcoholics are drunk every minute of the day! After all we are discussing people using MJ LEGALLY!

Even when they ARE stoned they have better judgment, and coordination than someone who is drunk
Which is probably why the majority of violent crime has ALWAYS involved alcohol.

[TAB]

That's exactly how I feel about the subject to! Alcoholics can have permits, so why not MJ users? Most are not stoned every minute of the day any more than the Alcoholics are drunk every minute of the day! After all we are discussing people using MJ LEGALLY!

If your a alcohlic a ffl can not legally sell you a gun. 

[Hazcat]

I'm NOT an alcoholic!  




I can't be!











I don't attend the meetings.  

[GUNS-R-US]

If your a alcohlic a ffl can not legally sell you a gun. 

I don't recall seeing that question on any of the forms I've filled out to buy most  of my guns.