Glock vs 1911- this question only comes around every .028 seconds or so in gun shops across the country. I love my 1911, and wouldn't be without at least one; however, light weight, high cap., and reliability virtues have to be looked at. I am a CCW guy, so a Glock fits the bill much of the time. The 1911 is great, but let's face it, it will pull your pants down without a really good belt and rig. In its natural form, it has 7 to 8 rounds, and we'll keep our fingers crossed that it will feed the wild man-stoppers we've stuffed in it. Personally, I have found that most 1911 can be made to feed anything, but once you've went though all the tweeking, it's still hard to know without a shadow of a doubt that the thing won't choke on you. The Glock has a better rep. for eating anything you put in it. The Glock will bring 14 to 15 rounds to the fight. I won't compare accuracy because they can both be tack drivers, and in a defence situation, accuracy isn't everything. On the range a 2 inch group at 25 yards is fun, but in a fight, being off an inch or two at five yards won't matter. The Glock has a lot in the way of blessings, but we pay for it in other areas. It's ugly, it's plastic ( not really ), it has some kind of voodoo magic striker system, when it goes bang you feel the whole process thoughout your body. At the end of the day, you have to ask "why do I need the thing". Once you have that nailed down, pick the one that fills the need. For me, I want to look at my 1911, but I want to carry my Glock. If you want to wrap your mind around a whole new question, consider a snubby in .357 mag for a carry gun. That will keep your gears turning for a month or so.