More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview

[Ksail101]

Tom- I had never read that story and it put a ball in my throat. The though that he had to tell his friend he had to shake the FBI tail to meet whoever it was is the worst thing I have heard. They had to tail him cause he used the first Amendment and gave his opinion. Right or wrong that is BS.

And just like in this case the FBI agents are told from higher up that this guy might have a screw loose (he is making wild claims) fallow him and see where he is going. So really the FBI is not in on it. It is the people he went and met. Most likely buried black op agent. Who if caught has no ties to this either. Essentially just a hit man.

The more I think about it the more I see how easy a cover up can be. Nature suspicion and the simple math of amount of people on the ground plus their own minds equals many stories and opinions to come out. And this is for any bit of evidence. Weapons used to number of shooters to amount of rounds shot. You put 20 forensic people in that school I bet you will get at least 5 different round counts. So the cover up is easy. Anytime someone asks the red button questions like where is camera footage in school. Block that question. Simple coaching of the Local Brass and a few key strokes the truth is buried.

[Ksail101]

What you could do if you had the right pull is find out if a government credit card or funding of any kind ie per diem for food cab, a rental car, government gas card. Something like that was used before in the area of Sandy Hook. That would tell you if someone was on the ground. The problem is if it is under a special ops umbrella that funding is really unaccounted for. There is a total that is paid off. You would almost have to find someone that works for Visa to find a card registered to government or the gas company's card registered to government to see if one was used in the area before the event at anytime. And if it was you trace it back from there.

Wow I have now thought about this too much.

[tombogan03884]

I had never heard of this Officer before Tyler said to google him, when I read that on a Cop Forum I almost sh!t.

[JLawson]

I won't speculate about the accuracy or credibility of TheTinMan's post, but I did notice something.  It was mentioned, more than once, that Officer Leakey spoke with "friends" and his wife about the suspicious nature of the bombing - that was a mistake.  In NICS-esque fashion... Rule #1 should be 'Keep your mouth shut.'  Gather your evidence, make multiple copies, send them to several news outlets anonymously, and don't leave a trail (physical, digital, or otherwise).  And above all, don't involve your family.

[Solus]

I won't speculate about the accuracy or credibility of TheTinMan's post, but I did notice something.  It was mentioned, more than once, that Officer Leakey spoke with "friends" and his wife about the suspicious nature of the bombing - that was a mistake.  In NICS-esque fashion... Rule #1 should be 'Keep your mouth shut.'  Gather your evidence, make multiple copies, send them to several news outlets anonymously, and don't leave a trail (physical, digital, or otherwise).  And above all, don't involve your family.

Poor guy was an amateur at this.  He probably didn't realize he couldn't trust the 'Good Guys' till it was too late.

[Sponsor]

[tombogan03884]

I won't speculate about the accuracy or credibility of TheTinMan's post, but I did notice something.  It was mentioned, more than once, that Officer Leakey spoke with "friends" and his wife about the suspicious nature of the bombing - that was a mistake.  In NICS-esque fashion... Rule #1 should be 'Keep your mouth shut.'  Gather your evidence, make multiple copies, send them to several news outlets anonymously, and don't leave a trail (physical, digital, or otherwise).  And above all, don't involve your family.

That was just the first one I picked to read and it seemed to have the most info in the most concise manner .
Here's the search result I got .

http://www.search.ask.com/web?o=15492&tpr=6&q=Terrence%2520+Yeakey

[cookie62]

This is a line from an article about the OKC bombing


At the time, domestic anti-terrorism legislation was stalled in Congress. Richard K. Moore wrote: "In my opinion. . . . the goal of the OKC operation was to pass the Anti-Terrorism Bill without debate. If there had been debate, then the issues of constitutional liberties and the creation of a police state would have been raised in public debate. Our rulers prefer that the police state be implemented without the public noticing. By creating a climate of national hysteria, using a staged "terrorist attack," the Bill sailed through with no debate or discussion. Mission accomplished."

Here is a link to the story
http://web.archive.org/web/20011211221744/http://www.patshannan.bizland.com/murrahintro.html