5 Taliban Killed In 28 Seconds At OVER 1MILE ! More "Sniper" B.S.

[ratcatcher55]

Maybe they were imperial seconds, like heavy tonnes the Brits use.

Do I think he killed 5 Taliban? Yea probably.

A mile away? Maybe. If the bad guys were moving that's some fast adjustment on the scope or alot of Kentucky windage hold over/under.

The time is just drama.

Good shooting for our team anyway.

Andy McNab view of the SAS raid in 92 was "polished up" according to the units CSM.

[sledgemeister]

In all fairness to the soldier concerned its reported by THE SUN, if there was a more rag rated newspaper I havent heard about one, these are the tards that pay people to make up BS about people. "a close friend of the royals revealed" type BS.
The questionability of the reporting is what should be called into question rather than bagging a bloke of what may or may not have taken place.

[billt]

These are the same kind of papers that report Big Foot was sighted eating lunch at Taco Bell last week.   Bill T.

[Timothy]

These are the same kind of papers that report Big Foot was sighted eating lunch at Taco Bell last week.   Bill T.

I heard Sasquatch was wrestling with Elvis over a chimichanga....

[sledgemeister]

These are the same kind of papers that report Big Foot was sighted eating lunch at Taco Bell last week.   Bill T.

Exactly!! theyre filth,

[Sponsor]

[Fatman]

It depends who you want to believe. It states 3 different times, 5 men were killed in 28 seconds. 1.) The headline of the article. 2.) The lead paragraph that is highlighted. 3.) In the side article written by Mr. McNab titled, "My View". I think it's all B.S. Ever notice how these sniper records that were held for years, are now being broken what seems like every few weeks? Each time they are the story becomes all the more difficult to believe.  Bill T.

Yeah, something I've noticed over the years is the headlines often misstate the article or act as a one-line op-ed along the political lines of the paper. Often the article states something quite different than the headline would lead you to believe.

Editors apparently take a hint from the 2 second TV sound bites, hope no one actually reads the article.

AS for this article, I agree that everyone is a god recently.

[m25operator]

Questioning the shots is reasonable, I don't see a magazine at all in any picture, and the mags on these rifles, even at 5rds protrude. I think the pictures were staged. And what round was he shooting, did he have a Raufus, that would take out 3-5 people in 1 shot. More info needed.

[atmiller]

Maybe he shot the first one, then "took out" the rest with an air strike. 

[deepwater]

In all fairness to the soldier concerned its reported by THE SUN, if there was a more rag rated newspaper I havent heard about one, these are the tards that pay people to make up BS about people. "a close friend of the royals revealed" type BS.
The questionability of the reporting is what should be called into question rather than bagging a bloke of what may or may not have taken place.

I must say they do a good job with the page 3 girls..       

http://www.page3.com/
 

deepwater

[billt]

If this guy had honestly accomplished this feat, it would be all over Fox News, The Military Channel, and every newsworthy magazine in the free world. Instead it appears only in a rag with about the same integrity as The National Enquirer. There is nothing on You Tube either.  Bill T.