« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Why Doesn't The CIA Assassinate The Wiki-Leaks Guy ?  (Read 2474 times)

twyacht

  • "Cogito, ergo armatum sum."
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10419
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Why Doesn't The CIA Assassinate The Wiki-Leaks Guy ?
« Reply #10 on: October 23, 2010, 07:45:54 PM »
good guy or not TomB, Armitage was the leak about Plame, the MSM covered for him, threw Libby to the lions, and good or not, took the cover and walked away scott free..

Politics make strange bedfellows, better than a horsehead in your bed.

Logged
Thomas Jefferson: The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government. That is why our masters in Washington are so anxious to disarm us. They are not afraid of criminals. They are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants."
Col. Jeff Cooper.

philw

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3680
  • Aussie Aussie Aussie, Oi Oi Oi
    • Australian Hunting Net
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Why Doesn't The CIA Assassinate The Wiki-Leaks Guy ?
« Reply #11 on: October 25, 2010, 06:45:48 AM »
Julian Assange is a compeate arse clown

ask your self  why is he only going after the "western countries leeks  why not middle eastern or China   ::)


Quote from: twyacht on October 23, 2010, 03:12:57 PM
Even though Armitage was the Plame "leaker"....Libby got burned,.....Armitage got "nada"....Plame wrote a book, even though she was just a desk jockey and made a fortune,....

I think "someone" made an attempt at a sex assault charge with this Assage clown with the first round of doc's leaked.....


that is still under investigation   apparently

http://memeburn.com/2010/10/global-fame-but-who-is-julian-assange-of-wikileaks/
Logged
Here’s to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently. They’re not fond of rules. And they have no respect for the status quo. You can praise them, disagree with them, quote them, disbelieve them, glorify or vilify them. The only thing you can’t do is ignore them

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Why Doesn't The CIA Assassinate The Wiki-Leaks Guy ?
« Reply #12 on: October 25, 2010, 11:25:19 AM »
I'm of 2 opinions on this, I agree with the idea of free press, and I think it imperative that, with all the Partisan BS put out , the historical record should be preserved accurately.
What I disagree with is releasing the information while it is still useful to any one besides historians.
There was a time when the press had a sense of responsibility, such as not showing FDR being lifted from his car.
Logged

PegLeg45

  • NRA Life, SAF, Constitutionalist
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13267
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1366
Re: Why Doesn't The CIA Assassinate The Wiki-Leaks Guy ?
« Reply #13 on: October 25, 2010, 01:55:26 PM »
Quote from: tombogan03884 on October 25, 2010, 11:25:19 AM
I'm of 2 opinions on this, I agree with the idea of free press, and I think it imperative that, with all the Partisan BS put out , the historical record should be preserved accurately.
What I disagree with is releasing the information while it is still useful to any one besides historians.
There was a time when the press had a sense of responsibility, such as not showing FDR being lifted from his car.

+1

Just because the right and capability exist, doesn't always mean it is necessary to be done.
Common sense should prevail (of course it usually doesn't).
Logged
"I expect perdition, I always have. I keep this building at my back, and several guns handy, in case perdition arrives in a form that's susceptible to bullets. I expect it will come in the disease form, though. I'm susceptible to diseases, and you can't shoot a damned disease." ~ Judge Roy Bean, Streets of Laredo

For the Patriots of this country, the Constitution is second only to the Bible for most. For those who love this country, but do not share my personal beliefs, it is their Bible. To them nothing comes before the Constitution of these United States of America. For this we are all labeled potential terrorists. ~ Dean Garrison

"When it comes to the enemy, just because they ain't pullin' a trigger, doesn't mean they ain't totin' ammo for those that are."~PegLeg

Ichiban

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1847
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Why Doesn't The CIA Assassinate The Wiki-Leaks Guy ?
« Reply #14 on: October 25, 2010, 02:18:40 PM »
Quote from: PegLeg45 on October 25, 2010, 01:55:26 PM
+1

Just because the right and capability exist, doesn't always mean it is necessary to be done.
Common sense should prevail (of course it usually doesn't).

"I had the right to remain silent... but I didn't have the ability"
- Ron White
Logged

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: Why Doesn't The CIA Assassinate The Wiki-Leaks Guy ?
« Reply #15 on: Today at 12:39:53 PM »
Logged

MikeBjerum

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10995
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1140
Re: Why Doesn't The CIA Assassinate The Wiki-Leaks Guy ?
« Reply #15 on: October 26, 2010, 07:46:23 AM »
With Rights comes responsibility, and you can't legislate responsibility.

To avoid a "Ron White Rant" I will just agree with Bogan!
Logged
If I appear taller than other men it is because I am standing on the shoulders of others.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Why Doesn't The CIA Assassinate The Wiki-Leaks Guy ?
« Reply #16 on: October 26, 2010, 11:32:41 AM »
Quote from: m58 on October 26, 2010, 07:46:23 AM
With Rights comes responsibility, and you can't legislate responsibility.

To avoid a "Ron White Rant" I will just agree with Bogan!

Why ? He seems to make more sense hammered than a lot of people do sober .
Am I missing something ?       ???
Don't tell me, he's Canadian ?   ;D
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk