I was refering to the current governments as "our bastards", same with Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the UAE.
FQ13
Oh.
In that case I have to agree with your point that we support "our bastards" because they are better than the other bastards.
But if you want an example of what happens when we don't pick a bastard to support just look at Somalia, or Rwanda.
This was one of the benefits of the "Cold War". Every place in the world was of interest to one side or the other, therefore they attracted attention from both sides trying to counter each others influence. The cash paid to separate sides helped the people because the politicians couldn't steal it
all and continuing the "investment gave the more civilized countries (US , USSR & to a lesser extent China ) some influence in keeping the atrocities to a reasonable level.
The root of many of the problems in Africa, (Somalia, Liberia, Rwanda, etc ) was that with the end of the open confrontation between Super Power's no one had any stake in maintaining stability in these places. From a view point of pure national interest, who really gives a crap what happens in Darfur, or Sierra Leone ? Honestly ? No one except NGO's who owe their existance to the continuing mis fortune of these people.
Has anyone seen Robert Duval lately?

I was thinking Omar Sharif .
