Life is sacred. It should never be ended lightly. On one side I would argue the individual's right (assisted by definition takes it out of the individual realm, though) and on the other my biggest opposition comes from what I heard surrounding the healthcare law. Apparently, there were provisions for "end of life" counseling. If I go to a medical facility, I go to bet better. If assisted suicide is on the menu of options they can recommend, how do you think that will play out in a few decades?
I agree. Life should never be ended lightly. The assisted suicide debate, (and Dr. K's conviction), came about because the medical/legal/political society can't agree on what end of life decisions
you as an individual, could make. The "assisted" part was because most people without medical training don't know what will chemicals will kill you painlessly, peacefully and don't have access to them.
If you "go to a med facility to get better" and are diagnosed with a large, agressive cancer tumor that surroundeds many large and small blood vessels, you are
NOT going to "get better" if the team of docs say it is inoperable and terminal.
If your second or third opinion docs say the same things, do you want to have the option to end your now numbered days on your terms painlessly, or do you want to die in agony because some bureaucrat, (political/legal/medical), says you should - and FORCES you to?
In a few decades, sadly, I believe that this debate will still be going on. Too many people believe that docs can cure anything.
The truth is death will be the fate of ALL of us whether we like it or not.
Interesting discussion...