not unless they can back them up. At best you could argue this, then have the judge instruct the jury, to disreguard the argument.
Have you ever seen a civil trial? An "expert" can testify that the sky is purple, it is XX's fault, and no, the judge CANNOT instruct the jury to disregard the argument. If it is presented properly, as in rules of the court, it stays in the court record.
Think about it for a second, what argument would you use to prove that you being armed ment you could have defended yourself.
Wow, that's a tough one. Let's see...has there EVER been an incident where someone armed defended themselves? I googled it and only got 12,000,000 results so no, I guess not.
Has there EVER been an incident where I defended myself? Yes.
3 times with a firearm and I haven't had to fire a shot.
The " I'm highly trained" deal won't work unless you can actually back that up, with out making yourself look like a gun nut/baby killer.
Now think about how you are going to counter that argument?
which is easier to do?
Which argument can I make while alive and which one can I make when I'm dead?
I'll take alive.
You really need to change your water supply, or buy shirts with a bigger collar.