Well Mr Lawson, I intend to piss you off.
Well FQ13, you may be disappointed - I am not pissed, chapped, or offended and my anatomy remains as it was before. You see, I agree with every one of your points and admit to being somewhat confused by your empassioned reply. In one of my previous replies in this thread, I stated that I believe 110% in the aggressive application of one's constitutional rights. Your assumption that I am someone "who thinks that we should just obey unless and until someone in authority says we don't have to" could not be further from the truth. I didn't say anything that should lead to that assumption. As a matter of fact, I said we should fight to change those laws that should be changed. We do that, don't we, when we call and write our Representatives and Senators. That's what we do, isn't it, when we send our donations to the NRA, SAF, and other groups.
I do not disagree with the video's primay message. I question the video's more subtle message that it's OK to disobey a law just because you don't like it. Now please understand, I'm not talking about any kind of "shoot 'em if they dissent" decree - our Founding Fathers took care of that potentiality by giving us the Second Amendment. You say to question authority... I agree.
I can question authority without breaking existing law. I don't think we should have to have a permit to carry a concealed weapon... but I have one. I think that gun-free zones are murder traps... but I don't carry when I must go to one. I don't think there should be a stop sign at 4th and Elm... but I still come to a complete stop. There's a pattern here. Disagree with the law but respect the law - until you can get it changed through aggressive and organized activism. It's very difficult to fight for a cause while sitting behind bars.
As to your academic service, Sir, I'm sure you were a fine teacher. I, too, have spent some time behind the lectern and found the experience a very positive one.