Ah the ol' 9mm vs. 40 S&W thread,....
I bought my first semi auto handgun in the early 90's...A S&W Model 411 in .40....Yes it had the Clintonista mag disconnect...However, I have noticed history and trends,, and offer a few observations regardless of brand.
The Glock 22 is still one of the hottest sellers on the pistol market. (It's .40)
The M&P line of .40 has been incorporated in too many LEO/SHP, etc,.. agencies to count.
The .40 incorporates a high capacity platform with ballistics better than a 9mm (still a shortened down .38),...
I also own a couple of 9's,...as ammo had to catch up to get better over the years. But so did the .380 and even the .327.
Regardless, (and the .45 crowd, of which I own a couple also aside),....there are more .40's in LE agencies than 9's....
For those that cannot afford a quiver of a 9 this day, or a .45 that day, or a .40 on Sunday, or a .357 on Tues,..the .40 was designed specifically because it addressed the shortcomings of a 9mm....
Too many criminals in prison BRAG about there gunshot scars with a 9....
The same cannot be said about the .40....(reminder,,,I own and practice with a multitude of calibers).
and I am reminded of the old addage:
"Professionals argue tactics. -- Amateurs argue caliber."
Anonymous
P.S. My leetle Kel-Tec P3AT is a bad momma-jomma at close range also....
"Amateurs train until they get it right, professionals train until they cannot get it wrong. If you've seen police qualifications, you know this is false. Amateurs train until they get it right, professionals train no more than they are paid to."
E. Charles