Author Topic: Antique musket  (Read 4128 times)

PegLeg45

  • NRA Life, SAF, Constitutionalist
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13288
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1434
Re: Antique musket
« Reply #10 on: April 09, 2012, 03:38:58 PM »
The eagle stamping would hint at it not being a limey bang stick. If the gun was in one piece, the eagle would have been at the base of the barrel completely covered by the forearm.  Why would they tinker and modify something like that if it wasn't readily visible?

I agree.....I'm leaning toward US made due to the Hartford stamp and the eagle also.
As to the mods, you never know what folks will do to a rifle.   :-\
"I expect perdition, I always have. I keep this building at my back, and several guns handy, in case perdition arrives in a form that's susceptible to bullets. I expect it will come in the disease form, though. I'm susceptible to diseases, and you can't shoot a damned disease." ~ Judge Roy Bean, Streets of Laredo

For the Patriots of this country, the Constitution is second only to the Bible for most. For those who love this country, but do not share my personal beliefs, it is their Bible. To them nothing comes before the Constitution of these United States of America. For this we are all labeled potential terrorists. ~ Dean Garrison

"When it comes to the enemy, just because they ain't pullin' a trigger, doesn't mean they ain't totin' ammo for those that are."~PegLeg

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Antique musket
« Reply #11 on: April 09, 2012, 03:52:31 PM »
The Eagle with arrows is either a proof mark or a company logo, all the military rifles mentioned had a stock that extended to near the muzzle, a trend that continued through the 03 Springfield and SMLE.
Additionally, the butt plate is wrong for a military rifle.

Nothing about gun companies located there but the town is in NW Conn.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Hartford,_Connecticut

lhprop1

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 415
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Antique musket
« Reply #12 on: April 09, 2012, 04:07:02 PM »
all the military rifles mentioned had a stock that extended to near the muzzle, a trend that continued through the 03 Springfield and SMLE.
Additionally, the butt plate is wrong for a military rifle.

That's good to know.  Is there a chance that it was sporterized like was done with so many of the SMLE's (like mine is) or didn't they do that back then?
Bravery and stupidity are often synonymous.  So are cowardice and intelligence.

"We Americans have been a rebellious band of freedom loving vagabonds from the very beginning. Our freedom from the crown and tyranny would not exist had it not been for the gun. That's a tradition we like to hold on to.  The same can't be said for the rest of you 'Subjects of the Queen'."--said to a Canadian friend who just doesn't get it.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Antique musket
« Reply #13 on: April 09, 2012, 08:57:19 PM »
That's good to know.  Is there a chance that it was sporterized like was done with so many of the SMLE's (like mine is) or didn't they do that back then?

I don't believe there was any formal "sporterizing" of military surplus guns, it would have been a home made job.
The combination of the short stock, curved butt plate, trigger guard, and ramrod guide rib make me think this was a purely civilian rifle.
The location of New Hartford in NW Conn puts it right in the heart of "gun valley" between Hartford and Springfield.
until the middle of the 20th century this area, along with Remington and Henry in NY state produced  all the commercial mass production fire arms made in the US, along with the vast majority of military arms.

sledgemeister

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1811
  • Democrat Sheeples
    • Australian Hunting Net
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Antique musket
« Reply #14 on: April 10, 2012, 07:55:07 AM »
Looks kinda like a Springfield, but the fancy trigger guard is throwing me off....can't find matching photo...my google-fu is weak today.


I did find a photo of a Hawken Plains rifle that was close, but still off. It could have been custom made.

http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Guide_to_Muzzleloaders


I think youre spot on, definately a half stock "Rocky Mountain Rifle" variant of some brand/manufacturer.
Would be interesting to know the barrel length and bore size.

I suggest that the OP post this on the muzzleloading forum, some of them are walking encyclopedias on anything muzzleloading.
http://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/fusionbb/fusionbb.php

I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let's start with typewriters. - Solomon Short

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: Antique musket
« Reply #15 on: Today at 04:52:26 AM »

lhprop1

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 415
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: Antique musket
« Reply #15 on: April 10, 2012, 08:34:04 AM »
Thanks for all the help guys.  Someone on another forum (a weightlifting forum, nonetheless) found this http://www.gunauction.com/search/displayitem.cfm?itemnum=8707443 and it sure looks to be a Hawken.  With a little touching up, it will look good above my fireplace. 
Bravery and stupidity are often synonymous.  So are cowardice and intelligence.

"We Americans have been a rebellious band of freedom loving vagabonds from the very beginning. Our freedom from the crown and tyranny would not exist had it not been for the gun. That's a tradition we like to hold on to.  The same can't be said for the rest of you 'Subjects of the Queen'."--said to a Canadian friend who just doesn't get it.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: Antique musket
« Reply #16 on: April 10, 2012, 09:25:55 AM »
"Hawken" is a style of rifle now that refers to what is actually a "Plains" or "Mountain" rifle.
In the era yours was produced it specifically referred to rifles produced by the Hawken brothers of St Louis for the  Mountain men engaged in the fur trade.
The wiki link below contains technical info on barrel length, caliber range, etc that may help some what.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawken_rifle

 

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk