The bahamas can bring in lots of tourists and businesses from the tourist industry. I went on a tour of the Bahmas driven by a guy named Perry. The first thing he showed us was the "Slums". He pointed out all the satellite diahes on the houses and explained the low crime rate there. Later on he showed my wife and I the Atlantis resort where a south african coumpany had bought the place and sank in over $200 MILLION dollars in renovations to it.
That's a lot of money to put in an area and if the government wasn't stable, secure, and prosperous for business, the company would've gone elsewhere.
Even today they are still making priofits in that country with little to no natural resources and not heavy industry besides tourism. Unlike the predominantly white Dutch government.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2133867/Dutch-government-collapses-level-budget-cuts-talks-fail-Prime-Minister-quits-failure-bring-national-debt.html#ixzz1t3yPS2pXAs for the US. We have less unemployment than Spain even when adjusted for those who gave up (11%-12% hell I'll even go 15% compared to 24.4%) Our dollar is more secure than the euro. And high priced items like the Jeep Grand Cherokee are in such high demand that Chryslter has cancellled the annual two week shut down to play catch up instead. It's all a matter of perspective isn't it.
Now @ Twyacht
We should also look at all the other riots that have gone on in recent times due to nothing more than those cities winning sporting events.
Case in point Detroit, 1984. The Tigers win the world series and the fans all file out and tear the place apart. They toss over cop cars and light them up. Lots of white people caused that riot. Blacks as well.
Same can be said for other large cities as well as college towns too. Mainly of white persuasion when it comes to the college towns.
Riots usually happen because of one of two things. Drunkenss or Rage.
Remember this post?
http://www.downrange.tv/forum/index.php?topic=19336.0There you commend these peopple for their civil unrest against what they percieved as tyrrany. How are these other riots not a result of percieved tyranny against the local government there? The actions and results may be different, but the flash cause is the same.
Now to bring up why I come on so strong against these types of posts.
First of all, while this back and forth has been between me and Tombogan03884 and now you Twyacht, it's to get the attention of everyone here.
We are forgetting why we are here. We are here to enjoy, encourage, and expand shooting and all things surrounding it. By posting on this forum and any other firearm forum we have become ambassadors to the cause. We need to make sure that new people lurking around feel welcome to join here. That means every firearm owner or future owner. Regardless of their race, creed, color, sexual preference, or political belief.
I want you guys to listen to something. It'll take roughly 5 minutes to listen to. Here's the link:
http://gunrightsradio.com/blog/2012/04/27/bar-stool-discussion-live-041/Put it at the 45 minute mark and listen until roughly the 50 minute mark.
They guy makes a serious point. How many brothers and sisters of another caliber are we losing when all they see are posts like this one insinuating that minorities can not run a government because they are too stupid? Or that they are too violent? Or that they are all racists? Or that they are the destroyers of morailty?
How many feel that these posts lump them all into one group and are only singled out when called on it?
How many potential customers does Michael Bane lose due to these posts. How many fellow firearm owners have we lost due to percieved hatred and biggotry?
There are better ways to make your point. Instead of making it sound like all people of a type are the cuase of anger and stryfe, you can point out that its the usual extremist group of a given population that is causing the problem and then point out the other people in the group that disagree with them.
Instead of saying a group can't run a government, you can point out the ones that are doing good in their prospective elected positions. Judges, representtives, counsel members, ect..
And do you really think the majority of Democrats in office really give a damn about gun control? No! They only follow what the numbers tell them about their constituants.
We bring the Democratic gun owners in and make an honest long term investment to make them equals among us. You'll see the whole gun control crap go by the wayside.
Politicians want one of two things:
1 to be re-elected
2 to serve their constituants - if they are that rare breed.
The greedy ones that want to be re-elected will do whatever it takes to get money and support. If that means backing pro gun legislation, they'll do it while kissing a baby.
So the chooice is yours.
We can continue on like we're doing now and weaken ourselves and our cause; or we can be true ambasadors and take the high road to immortality.
What's your choice?