OK. borrowing a page from the opposition. Though we don't know just yet what exactly makes this guy tick, reports from reputable sources are quoted as saying Holmes is a Black Bloc member and an Occupy member; of which Occupy received substantial support from Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic members of Congress. In fact, according to these sources, Holmes was a California Democrat in the truest sense who supported Obama and other left-wing radical movements and ideas as learned growing up in San Diego. Questioning of Congressional Democrats must occur to determine what kind of a connection between Holmes and Congressional Democrats may exists and how their support and possible personal support to Occupy made it possible for Holmes to obtain these weapons of mass destruction.
Next, the Cinemark chain should be held wholly responsible for the senseless slaughter that occurred because of a total lack of security. Cinemark enjoyed a certain benefit from the total of the $165 million that was taken in or projected to be taken in for this movie thus far over the weekend. Social concience and responsibility demands that Cinemark be held accountable for not providing a safe enviornoment for it's patrons. And clearly, if Holmes did enter by breaking through an exit door as has been reported by various sources then Cinemark must be entirely held responsible for substandard design which should immediately be upgraded across the country. In short, to be a good social citizen, Cinemark must immediately provide security for its patrons, upgrade it's possibly flimsy facilities if the exit door entry by breaking down really did happen and finally separate itself from any vestiage of corporate greed by giving back all profits of this and other movie to both the families of the victims of this tragedy and to organizations and individuals who might have prevented this horrible occurence had they been allowed.
Now guys...muse on that a bit. In the Luby's ruling the Supreme Court has made companies responsible for security when they especially if the prevent someone from defending themself... I think there have been 4 or 5 similar rulings. I know here that Cinemark has those cutesy circles and bars through handgun decals that stops all bad guys. But seriously, we need to not let the other side use this and one way is to demand corporate social responsibility. I don't know if the liberal lawyers are sharpening their knives yet for one of their own, but if I was a victim I'd be suing Cinemark for allowing this to happen and movie company for allowing their movie to be shown in substandard and unsafe facilities.
We just can't lay here and say that we are good guys and our way would have prevented the magnitude of this tragedy. We need to give the opposition, staying truthful of course, the same dose they try to feed us when something horrible like this happens. So, the company that did not protect it's patrons needs to be hounded across the country and at their Plano office with pickets demanding they turn from their corporate greed and pay for "cheap and affordable" security...demanding of course from our Congressional Reps and Senators that a federal bill tied to interstate trade insures at least one paid cop on duty in each individual movie they show....a work program of sorts. Let us see if the cute little circle and bar with a handgun in it will stand here and take that action towards other companies....we need to use this as a watershed to see Cinemark bankrupted over this and strike common sense into other irresponsible corporations that the cute decals they post come with financial responsibility.
OK...I'm posting without reviewing.. dangerous thing. Maybe some of our manufacturers can fund some people to stir social responsiblity up in this or a like manner.
MBTV
Forum Index
Help
Calendar
Contact Info
Register as a member
