Author Topic: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview  (Read 22737 times)

Timothy

  • Guest
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #30 on: January 21, 2013, 06:48:29 PM »
CT has NO current magazine capacity regulations.  They tried and failed to get it out of committee.

Continue with your conspiracy discussion...I find it entertaining!  Plausible, yes!  Believable, not very!

Carry on...

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #31 on: January 21, 2013, 08:25:31 PM »
Would you have believed it 10 or 20 years ago if some one had told you about life under Obama ?

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7699
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 612
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #32 on: January 21, 2013, 08:50:03 PM »
All the "news" stories people are posting are from the day of and day after.  I understand the police got search warrants for the school the car and the house and asked for a 90 day gag order on anything found.  There is no New News.

And this is fueling a lot of the speculation.

Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW 1968-1972

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #33 on: January 21, 2013, 11:00:56 PM »
All the "news" stories people are posting are from the day of and day after.  I understand the police got search warrants for the school the car and the house and asked for a 90 day gag order on anything found.  There is no New News.

And this is fueling a lot of the speculation.



Complete opposite of Colo where we got a run down of every action except when the guy took a dump.

Tyler Durden

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 992
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #34 on: January 21, 2013, 11:50:58 PM »
CT has NO current magazine capacity regulations.  They tried and failed to get it out of committee.

Continue with your conspiracy discussion...I find it entertaining!  Plausible, yes!  Believable, not very!

Carry on...

Hey, if you spotted a retraction in the Newton Bee newspaper about one of the apprehended guys was NOT a SWAT team ninja from another local police department, I am all ears...err ... eyes.  If you don't know what I am talking about, browse back through my posts in this thread.  You'll see the link to the Newton Bee newspaper.

Or if you have an explanation for the two black jacket/sweatshirt looking things on the pavement next to the car, let's hear it.

If I was shooter number 2, 3, or 4, I'd want to rid myself of my GSR covered disguise/costume/uniform  too, before hopping into the get away car.  Or at least make it look like I had normal street clothes on if I needed to egress on foot and to better  blend into the crowd of arriving and panicing parents before disappearing forever.

EDIT:
Fictional character Sherlock Homes said:
Quote
'...when you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.'




Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #35 on: Today at 04:26:28 PM »

Timothy

  • Guest
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #35 on: January 22, 2013, 06:22:24 AM »
I don't read the paper Tyler.

I do know one thing about conspiracies!  In order for two people to keep a secret this heinous, you have to kill one!  

I seriously doubt that trained men of any but the worst of the worst of humanity, could kill 20 small children in such a way as to create this sensational story.  Then to submit that the local PD, state PD and FBI, school district, families, et al are all in on it is scary!

If this is the case, this is a world and society not worth saving!

PABLO DEL NORTE

  • Active Forum Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 98
  • SHOULDA BEEN A COWBOY
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #36 on: January 22, 2013, 08:08:27 AM »
It could be they are simply adjusting the story to try to fit in the unexpected discovery of facts.
     
 :o GASP!!  THE GOV'T WOULD NOT DO SUCH A THING.  :o
OH YEAH, SORRY.  JFK, LEONARD PELTIER. RFK. MLK, MALCOM X, JIMMY HOFFA, FAST & FURIOUS, ETC  !!
 

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #37 on: January 22, 2013, 08:47:37 AM »
I don't read the paper Tyler.

I do know one thing about conspiracies!  In order for two people to keep a secret this heinous, you have to kill one!  

I seriously doubt that trained men of any but the worst of the worst of humanity, could kill 20 small children in such a way as to create this sensational story.  Then to submit that the local PD, state PD and FBI, school district, families, et al are all in on it is scary!

If this is the case, this is a world and society not worth saving!


Tim, Nothing you have posted is anything but wishful thinking .
There seem to be an awful lot of items to make you say "WTF ?".
I'm not even going to concede that it actually happened until I've got some kind of outside verification , such as some one posting that their cousins wife's barber lost a child .
What I'm getting at is we have ONLY the media story, no hear say, verification , nothing .
The only thing we're hearing outside the media are the anomalies .

Timothy

  • Guest
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #38 on: January 22, 2013, 06:14:50 PM »
Well Tom, I am hopeful that such wickedness doesn't exist but I certainly can concede it might.

I don't like misinformation any more than the rest of you!  I also don't care to read the drivel that exists in every corner of the blogosphere about everything from JFK to Yoda either! 

BTW, Yoda was gay!  ;D

Today, the CT SP issued a statement concerning the what and where part of the question on the Bushy rifle, Sig and Glock handguns and Saiga shotgun retrieved from the trunk of the car.  The rest is still being kept close to the vest!  The remainder found on the web is speculation from folks trying to read between the ever fuzzy lines from a media that is obviously slanted in the direction of deceit. 

Remember, I lived in CT for 18 years.  It is not, for the most part, an "anti-gun" state!  In fact, that part of CT is still the main home of several firearms manufacturers and support companies.  Everyone I knew in those 18 years, shot, hunted and generally were gun people!  I would find it more plausible if this occurred in Walthham or Newton, MA where real, bone fide liberal assholes reside!

I still find it difficult to swallow and entire communities conspiracy in this terrible event!  I hope I'm not proven wrong but like most things of this nature, we never really know the truth.

Note to Tyler,

I'm not denying that the information you've drudged up is not curious, even damning!  I'm just really skeptical of literally EVERYTHING I read on the web!


tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #39 on: January 22, 2013, 06:23:49 PM »
"that part of CT is still the main home of several firearms manufacturers and support companies.  Everyone I knew in those 18 years, shot, hunted and generally were gun people!"

That's part of what makes me suspicious .  Isn't NSSF headquartered in Newtown .

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk