Author Topic: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview  (Read 22728 times)

Tyler Durden

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 992
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #20 on: January 20, 2013, 06:29:53 PM »
Tom

76 Branch Davidians were killed not 26. Janet Reno is responsible for the murder of 23 children in that attack.

And supposedly David Koresh ate breakfast every day at the same diner in Waco.

Why not arrest him then when he was away from his "arsenal"?


Tyler Durden

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 992
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #21 on: January 20, 2013, 06:48:00 PM »
I am trying to apply a little common sense to all of this, and that is all I have, a little. If this were some federal government bred conspiracy, then just how many people and organizations need to be in on it to cover tracks? Lots. We're talking federal, state, county, municipal police departments and fire departments. I don't believe the federal government is either that good or that smart to get away with it. I don't believe that all those first responders who got there in minutes would give any conspirators enough time to lay all the right evidence and recover or cover up their own. Then there are the families, whose genuineness can be so easily verified or refuted by other locals who were not part of any conspiracy. Do we pretend that a whole town is implicated in the conspiracy?

What I do believe is this: It really happened along the lines thus far reported. The government and some other authorities (state and local) have only released data that conforms to their vested interests in the event. If we want to investigate such collusion, then follow the money. Some of the local and state authorities can collude with the feds and sudden, unexplained money and equipment transfers will have taken place to support local police, fire and school authorities.

I don't believe that Fast and Furious was as advertised by the government, because it basically involved only them and a few nefarious characters they thought they could control. There they had near total control until the fatal mistake (killing of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry). And that is something to think about when you suspect a total, contrived federal government conspiracy. The feds have hamartia! A fatal flaw that always gives them up in the end. To me, Sandy Hook doesn't smell that way. It was just a convenient excuse to pounce on for something they have always wanted: gun control. So they control the story to their own benefit, but that won't last long either. Remember hamartia; it's the only friend we have.

None of my comments are meant to discourage Tyler from digging up inconsistencies in the government's story. For, it will be those inconsistencies that will make the government's story unravel. Like any liar, they will start telling lies to cover up the lies they have already told.

Okay, let me run this past you.

The Obama administration, Leon Panetta, and Hillary Clinton and whoever else sat back and watched the live satellite feed video from the drone hovering over Benghazi.

They watched at least 4 Americans die on live TV, had tons of resources to call in to rescue them or fend off the attack, and yet they did absolutely nothing.

 >:(

Obama went to bed and slept like a baby, I'm guessing.

bulldog75

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1171
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 15
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #22 on: January 21, 2013, 04:49:39 AM »
Explain Whitewater and what happened to all the people associated with the President at that time.
Citizens sleep peacfully at night knowing that rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf - George Orwell

crusader rabbit

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2731
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 30
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #23 on: January 21, 2013, 07:46:04 AM »

If this guy in the dark jacket and camo pants was the same Chris Manfredonia....well, I find it odd for somebody to wear camo pants to build gingerbread houses with his daughter at her school.


I don't know about that...  I sometimes wear camo pants for no other reason than they happen to be clean.  In Florida, it just isn't that unusual for somebody to be dressed in a camo shirt, or pants, or both for no particularly good reason except they were in his closet and they were clean.

Not to be argumentative, but it's just the way it is.

Crusader
“I’ve lived the literal meaning of the ‘land of the free’ and ‘home of the brave.’ It’s not corny for me. I feel it in my heart. I feel it in my chest. Even at a ball game, when someone talks during the anthem or doesn’t take off his hat, it pisses me off. I’m not one to be quiet about it, either.”  Chris Kyle

Tyler Durden

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 992
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #24 on: January 21, 2013, 12:46:26 PM »
That wasn't argumentative at all.  And if you want to, you can be as argumentative as you please, throw in personal insults, pick on my spelling or grammar, or throw other spurious ad hominem attacks at me.  Do everything but actually address the "facts", "testimony" , and "evidence".  I am used to that by now.

And I have gotten all that from just pointing out inconsistencies or like in this thread how some eye witness story does in fact jive up with what physical evidence I can glean from 1,000 miles away:  the black sweatshirts or jackets.

If this guy with the black top and camo pants was just there to build gingerbread houses with his daughter, then surely he wouldn't have minded getting his hands bagged and later wiped for gunshot residue.  Or that black top being submitted to the lab to also be checked for GSR, right?  His hands and top were checked for GSR, right?  RIGHT?! 

Newtown seemed to be a ritzier, high rent neighborhood.  I think the Lanza house zillow'ed at something like 1.7 million, and MaMa Lanza was reportedly receiving $12,500 a month in alimony/child support.  Me? If I were going to the school to build gingerbread houses with my daughter, I'd wear something a little more presentable.  But that is just me.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #25 on: Today at 04:11:11 PM »

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #25 on: January 21, 2013, 12:50:04 PM »
That wasn't argumentative at all.  And if you want to, you can be as argumentative as you please, throw in personal insults, pick on my spelling or grammar, or throw other spurious ad hominem attacks at me.  Do everything but actually address the "facts", "testimony" , and "evidence".  I am used to that by now.

And I have gotten all that from just pointing out inconsistencies or like in this thread how some eye witness story does in fact jive up with what physical evidence I can glean from 1,000 miles away:  the black sweatshirts or jackets.

If this guy with the black top and camo pants was just there to build gingerbread houses with his daughter, then surely he wouldn't have minded getting his hands bagged and later wiped for gunshot residue.  Or that black top being submitted to the lab to also be checked for GSR, right?  His hands and top were checked for GSR, right?  RIGHT?! 

Newtown seemed to be a ritzier, high rent neighborhood.  I think the Lanza house zillow'ed at something like 1.7 million, and MaMa Lanza was reportedly receiving $12,500 a month in alimony/child support.  Me? If I were going to the school to build gingerbread houses with my daughter, I'd wear something a little more presentable.  But that is just me.

Yer ugly and yer mother dresses you funny.    ;D

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #26 on: January 21, 2013, 05:23:08 PM »
Yer ugly and yer mother dresses you funny.    ;D

You should see him before his mother dresses him  ;D ;D
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

JC5123

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2572
  • Fortune sides with him who dares.
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #27 on: January 21, 2013, 05:31:59 PM »
You should see him before his mother dresses him  ;D ;D

Are you saying that you see him before he's dressed? EEEWWWWWW
I am a member of my nation's chosen soldiery.
God grant that I may not be found wanting,
that I will not fail this sacred trust.

twyacht

  • "Cogito, ergo armatum sum."
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10419
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #28 on: January 21, 2013, 06:16:09 PM »
Where's the coroner's report? In regards to caliber used in regards to the victims.

First reports had the AR left in the car and two handguns.

Than NBC reported 4 handguns and the AR left in the car.

http://video.today.msnbc.msn.com/today/50208495#50208495

Investigation "complex",...... WTF for?

Than the CT State Police said the AR did the majority of the shooting.

Than only a 12 guage was left in the car.

Than a "hunter" was apprehended nearby. Questioned and released. No other follow up.

He was "buzzed" in the door, than he shot through the door.....

He argued days before with school staff.

Really?

WTF is going on?

Were they 10rd CT compliant mags used in the handguns?

How many mags did he have?

Somethings afoot.





Thomas Jefferson: The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government. That is why our masters in Washington are so anxious to disarm us. They are not afraid of criminals. They are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants."
Col. Jeff Cooper.

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: More Sandy Hook inconsistencies, Katie Couric interview
« Reply #29 on: January 21, 2013, 06:25:20 PM »
Where's the coroner's report? In regards to caliber used in regards to the victims.

First reports had the AR left in the car and two handguns.

Than NBC reported 4 handguns and the AR left in the car.

http://video.today.msnbc.msn.com/today/50208495#50208495

Investigation "complex",...... WTF for?

Than the CT State Police said the AR did the majority of the shooting.

Than only a 12 guage was left in the car.

Than a "hunter" was apprehended nearby. Questioned and released. No other follow up.

He was "buzzed" in the door, than he shot through the door.....

He argued days before with school staff.

Really?

WTF is going on?

Were they 10rd CT compliant mags used in the handguns?

How many mags did he have?

Somethings afoot.







It could be they are simply adjusting the story to try to fit in the unexpected discovery of facts.
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk