I hope this scares the $h!t out of them

[Solus]

I've said it before, talk of "UN Troops" is paranoid, uninformed idiocy.
Who supplies the man power ?
How do they get here, who pays for it ?
Have you ever stopped to think how many troops would be required ?
It took 70,000 US troops over a month to secure a rock called Iwo Jima.
The Germans invaded Russia with over 4 million men and never made it to Moscow.
The type of operation required to put a meaningful military force ashore on the US would cripple the world economy.
No matter what uniforms they wear any troops the may operate in the US will be Americans.

That is all true if the goal is to conquer the US, but if it turns out that, say, only half the military is following BHO's orders, only enough fighters to ensure a destructive civil war would be needed.

A lot of feet on the ground would not be  needed either...just enough hardware to knock out major manufacturing centers.

[billt]

You have to remember the current population of the United States is over 310,000,000. That's a lot of people to try and change their behaviour. Especially when most of them are pissed off. The liberals hate guns, so they wouldn't last 5 minutes if they even had enough guts to support Hussein in a "Civil War". The Barbara Streisand's, Joy Behar's, and Sean Penn's of the world would be all hiding under their beds.

There is no way troops, not to mention military leaders, would support such action, let alone carry it out. Remember, we have an all volunteer army. They chose the military. And they didn't choose it to kill Americans. And if they tried to institute the draft in order to pull off such a fiasco, they would have so many draft dodgers it would make the 60's look pale in comparision. The entire thing is absurd, and nothing more than a wet dream, if even that, for Hussein.

[JC5123]

So far they seem to have no problem with killing and detaining American citizens without charge.

[billt]

So far they seem to have no problem with killing and detaining American citizens without charge.

Yes, but you can't compare whacking Anwar Al-Aulaqi with shooting half the population of Cedar Rapids, Iowa because they won't open their doors to have their weapons taken. One was relatively easy to accomplish. The other is an undertaking that is all but impossible.

[tombogan03884]

Yes, but you can't compare whacking Anwar Al-Aulaqi with shooting half the population of Cedar Rapids, Iowa because they won't open their doors to have their weapons taken. One was relatively easy to accomplish. The other is an undertaking that is all but impossible.

Yes, you can. especially if you factor in the Govt drone murder of his 16 Y/O son 2 weeks later.

That is all true if the goal is to conquer the US, but if it turns out that, say, only half the military is following BHO's orders, only enough fighters to ensure a destructive civil war would be needed.

A lot of feet on the ground would not be  needed either...just enough hardware to knock out major manufacturing centers.

You keep harping on this.
You're a fool.
The French could not even move forces to Mali with out US air lift.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Barbarossa

Operation Barbarossa, or Case Barbarossa (German: Unternehmen Barbarossa), was the code name for Germany's invasion of the Soviet Union during the Second World War.[14][15] Beginning on 22 June 1941, over 4 million soldiers of the Axis powers invaded the USSR along a 2,900 km (1,800 mi) front,[16] the largest invasion in the history of warfare. In addition to troops, Barbarossa used 600,000 motor vehicles and 750,000 horses.[17] The ambitious operation was driven by Adolf Hitler's persistent desire to conquer the Soviet territories (as embodied in Generalplan Ost). It marked the beginning of the pivotal phase in deciding the victors of the war. The German invasion of the Soviet Union suffered and caused a high rate of fatalities: 95% of all German Army casualties that occurred from 1941 to 1944, and 65% of all Allied military casualties from the entire war.

That was across a land border and it FAILED simply because the area covered was to large compared to the forces involved.
US gun owners out number any 2 armies in the world COMBINED.
Quit trying to ignore reality, when shooting starts you will be shooting cops and soldiers you may know.
They will be no different than your neighbor who is voting the country down the toilet.
In fact it may be that neighbor.

[Sponsor]

[billt]

Yes, you can. especially if you factor in the Govt drone murder of his 16 Y/O son 2 weeks later.

Again, easy to accomplish. Ask yourself why Castro has outlived 10 U.S. Presidents?

[JC5123]

Again, easy to accomplish. Ask yourself why Castro has outlived 10 U.S. Presidents?

Lack of willpower to whack him. However I believe that BHO HAS the will to come after us. We are in a cold war against the government. I think most of us right now are competing in an arms race and holding our breath, waiting for the next "shot heard round the world". The one that turns this current cold war hot. 

[Pathfinder]

I've said it before, talk of "UN Troops" is paranoid, uninformed idiocy.
Who supplies the man power ?
How do they get here, who pays for it ?
Have you ever stopped to think how many troops would be required ?
It took 70,000 US troops over a month to secure a rock called Iwo Jima.
The Germans invaded Russia with over 4 million men and never made it to Moscow.
The type of operation required to put a meaningful military force ashore on the US would cripple the world economy.
No matter what uniforms they wear any troops the may operate in the US will be Americans.

All true if you consider an invasion in combat, like Iwo, Russia, Normandy, et al.

What happens, though, if they are invited in? I just read a story - on Facebook, so you know it has to be true!!!!!  - about men traveling with one of DHS's new armored cars (1 of what was it, 2700?) on a flatbed truck, who all wore DHS uniforms with eagle insignia and who spoke with eastern European accents.

Forget the conspiracy stuff, importing foreign troops who do not have to fight their way in is a radically different story than an invasion in open combat.

And who would pay for it? We would, of course. Or rather, the .gov would.

[twyacht]

This will not end well. The Japanese knew it, the Blue Helmets don't even have the belly to stop genocide in a third world rat hole.

Invited or not, when the body bags start going back to Europa, the snivelling broke and whiny folks will bring it to a screeching halt. Not even George Soros has enough money to buy the one's going to rural America to fulfill a "directive" against insurgents.

[tombogan03884]

All true if you consider an invasion in combat, like Iwo, Russia, Normandy, et al.

What happens, though, if they are invited in? I just read a story - on Facebook, so you know it has to be true!!!!!  - about men traveling with one of DHS's new armored cars (1 of what was it, 2700?) on a flatbed truck, who all wore DHS uniforms with eagle insignia and who spoke with eastern European accents.

Forget the conspiracy stuff, importing foreign troops who do not have to fight their way in is a radically different story than an invasion in open combat.

And who would pay for it? We would, of course. Or rather, the .gov would.

It doesn't matter.
There are not enough available troops, ( troops not committed to other defensive duties by their own countries) to amount to a piss hole in the snow.
Everyone needs to face the reality that the future is not "Red Dawn" of the 1980's.
It will be Bosnia of the 1990's, or Kansas/Missouri of the 1850's.