Author Topic: North Korea  (Read 6770 times)

jnevis

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1479
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: North Korea
« Reply #10 on: April 04, 2013, 03:35:21 PM »
Guam is a VERY long way from Hawaii or the West Coast, especially in terms of IRBMs and Ballistic Missile Defenses.

Yes, he's an unknown, but he's playing right from Dad and Grandpa's playbook.  We've been here before.  They've also pushed further with us directly (USS Pueblo's capture and the EC-121 shoot-down in 68-69) BEFORE they had nukes.
It doesn't matter HOW unstable KSU is, if he uses even a small nuke anywhere, his regime is over and he knows it.  Even Big Brother China won't help him then.
When seconds mean the difference between life and death, the police will be minutes away.

You are either SOLVING the problem, or you ARE the problem.

twyacht

  • "Cogito, ergo armatum sum."
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10419
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: North Korea
« Reply #11 on: April 04, 2013, 05:07:08 PM »
The kicker is "little Un" has run his mouth so much they have to do something to save face.....

Personally, I'd glaze Pyongyang with a couple of stealth bombers, some strikes to their nuke plant, missle silo's, depots, fuel,

and go home. They don't have much but a lot of infantry. No real airforce, so let the A-10's and Spectre gun ships deal with that aspect.

But with BHO and John Kerry (he served in Vietnam BTW,), and Chuck "baggy eyes" Hagel, what,....me worry?

Thomas Jefferson: The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government. That is why our masters in Washington are so anxious to disarm us. They are not afraid of criminals. They are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants."
Col. Jeff Cooper.

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: North Korea
« Reply #12 on: April 04, 2013, 06:44:45 PM »
If he hit LA, or San Francisco I might vote for him.

philw

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3680
  • Aussie Aussie Aussie, Oi Oi Oi
    • Australian Hunting Net
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: North Korea
« Reply #13 on: April 04, 2013, 06:45:58 PM »
If he hit LA, or San Francisco I might vote for him.

Bhwaaaa.
Here’s to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently. They’re not fond of rules. And they have no respect for the status quo. You can praise them, disagree with them, quote them, disbelieve them, glorify or vilify them. The only thing you can’t do is ignore them

jnevis

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1479
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: North Korea
« Reply #14 on: April 04, 2013, 06:53:24 PM »
The kicker is "little Un" has run his mouth so much they have to do something to save face.....

Personally, I'd glaze Pyongyang with a couple of stealth bombers, some strikes to their nuke plant, missle silo's, depots, fuel,

and go home. They don't have much but a lot of infantry. No real airforce, so let the A-10's and Spectre gun ships deal with that aspect.

But with BHO and John Kerry (he served in Vietnam BTW,), and Chuck "baggy eyes" Hagel, what,....me worry?



Agreed, except an estimated 1 million infantry to our 450,000 (including SK army) even with air superiority is no laughing matter.  Going to need more than just Spectre and Hogs.

My concern is if it goes kinetic but stays conventional, does China stay out or do they jump in feet first.
When seconds mean the difference between life and death, the police will be minutes away.

You are either SOLVING the problem, or you ARE the problem.

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: North Korea
« Reply #15 on: Today at 11:35:24 PM »

twyacht

  • "Cogito, ergo armatum sum."
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10419
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: North Korea
« Reply #15 on: April 04, 2013, 07:40:08 PM »
If the Norks fight like its 1953 they will lose this time. There are too many container ships with Wal-Mart inventory coming to our ports on the left coast.

They need those container ships to maintain flow..

I did realize that there are at least two Ohio Class Nuke subs probably somewhere in the vicinity as well. Lot easier than Stealth Bombers out of Missouri.

IMHO, I think China treats the Norks as the red-headed step-child and let them run their mouth and take an ass whoopin. My remaining concern is OUR Admin.....

Someone needs to slap the snot out this little young man,....



History repeating itself it would seem.

Or Tom B. gets a history professorship... ;D
Thomas Jefferson: The strongest reason for the people to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against the tyranny of government. That is why our masters in Washington are so anxious to disarm us. They are not afraid of criminals. They are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants."
Col. Jeff Cooper.

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: North Korea
« Reply #16 on: April 04, 2013, 07:51:22 PM »
I remember reading about the leader of the Swiss Armed Forces gave when a German diplomat asked him what his army of 500,000 (probably the entire male population of age) would do against the 1,000,000 strong German Army.

His answer was  "Shoot twice"

We can let our air/naval support make up the difference. 

Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: North Korea
« Reply #17 on: April 04, 2013, 08:10:38 PM »
Agreed, except an estimated 1 million infantry to our 450,000 (including SK army) even with air superiority is no laughing matter.  Going to need more than just Spectre and Hogs.

My concern is if it goes kinetic but stays conventional, does China stay out or do they jump in feet first.


Numbers don't tell the true story.
The North Korean Army is starving less than the population, but they are starving.
All those NK tanks ?
If it were not for the oil that South Korea has donated they would not move.
China ?
Does not want the refugees they are getting now, never mind the whole civilian population running toward the food.

billt

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6751
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 477
Re: North Korea
« Reply #18 on: April 04, 2013, 08:53:07 PM »
The North Korean Army is starving less than the population, but they are starving.

An army runs on it's stomach. Their's are small enough to gain weight on Nutri-System.

rojawe

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1071
  • To the Republic for which it stands One Nation
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: North Korea
« Reply #19 on: April 04, 2013, 08:59:37 PM »
No Problem look where our leader is he's out  companying for Gun Control, Amnesty and obamacare and has no clue how to lead our country and when does his next vacation start.
His ass should be in DC directing this country and not companying against America and we have to look why the low level voters voted for the Food Stamp King.
EMPLOYERS STOP THE FLOOD E-VERIFY WORKS

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk