« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: sig brace update?  (Read 7825 times)

lv2shoot101

  • Forum Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
sig brace update?
« on: April 01, 2015, 03:41:34 PM »
I have just wondered if there has been any update on the sig brace. all I could find when I have searched for it has been stuff from back in January didn't know if there had been any new updates or rulings on the issue of redesigngor use of the sig brace Thanks
Logged

Solus

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8666
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 43
Re: sig brace update?
« Reply #1 on: April 01, 2015, 05:13:04 PM »
Last I heard BATFE ruled it was fine as manufactured ...  but I have no link to that announcement.
Logged
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
—Patrick Henry

"Good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority. It is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions. There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters."
— Daniel Webster

lv2shoot101

  • Forum Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: sig brace update?
« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2015, 05:38:40 PM »
I know they didnt remove it from manufacture, how it can or cannotbe utilized was more my question.   Wondered if there are any updates on that.
Logged

GASPASSERDELUXE

  • Guest
Re: sig brace update?
« Reply #3 on: April 01, 2015, 07:16:36 PM »
It can be used as an arm brace as origanaly intended. Useing it as as a shoulder stock would be illegal.
Logged

Big Frank

  • NRA Benefactor Member
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11269
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 1560
Re: sig brace update?
« Reply #4 on: April 01, 2015, 08:57:31 PM »
Quote from: Gaspasserdeluxe on April 01, 2015, 07:16:36 PM
It can be used as an arm brace as origanaly intended. Useing it as as a shoulder stock would be illegal.

That's what I read too.
Logged
""It may be laid down as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every Citizen who enjoys the protection of a free Government, owes not only a proportion of his property, but even his personal services to the defence of it, and consequently that the Citizens of America (with a few legal and official exceptions) from 18 to 50 Years of Age should be borne on the Militia Rolls, provided with uniform Arms, and so far accustomed to the use of them, that the Total strength of the Country might be called forth at a Short Notice on any very interesting Emergency." - George Washington. Letter to Alexander Hamilton, Friday, May 02, 1783

THE RIGHT TO BUY WEAPONS IS THE RIGHT TO BE FREE - A. E. van Vogt, The Weapon Shops of Isher

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: sig brace update?
« Reply #5 on: Today at 04:52:24 PM »
Logged

lv2shoot101

  • Forum Member
  • **
  • Posts: 4
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: sig brace update?
« Reply #5 on: April 01, 2015, 11:13:28 PM »
Ok thats what I had read too, but then I read the atf  definition of re design was being challenged. Just was curious

Thanks
Logged

Tyler Durden

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 992
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 4
Re: sig brace update?
« Reply #6 on: April 08, 2015, 04:14:08 AM »
Not that anything about our current government or its agencies make any sense....but...let's say you had this:



And you put the end of the buffer tube into your shoulder pocket and then rested your cheek on that foam cover...

Has the ATF commented on that?
Logged

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7621
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 588
Re: sig brace update?
« Reply #7 on: April 08, 2015, 04:07:09 PM »
You mean like one of these?





Suarez posted a picture with his cheek welded to the recoil buffer of a similar pistol and commented that it worked just fine like that.  No need for shoulder mount.
Logged
Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW 1968-1972

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: sig brace update?
« Reply #8 on: April 09, 2015, 06:12:18 AM »
Quote from: alfsauve on April 08, 2015, 04:07:09 PM
You mean like one of these?





Suarez posted a picture with his cheek welded to the recoil buffer of a similar pistol and commented that it worked just fine like that.  No need for shoulder mount.

I question how much of that is accurate, and how much is due to the fact that he has been shooting since the stone age.
Logged

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7621
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 588
Re: sig brace update?
« Reply #9 on: April 09, 2015, 06:45:12 AM »
Quote from: tombogan03884 on April 09, 2015, 06:12:18 AM
I question how much of that is accurate, and how much is do to the fact that he has been shooting since the stone age.

Good thing Gabe doesn't read this forum.   ;D

When I finally get to the 100yd range, I'll test various, legal of course <cough> <cough>, and see what I can do. 
Logged
Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW 1968-1972
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »
 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk