Two key items in the article I read were one that I would call bipartisan - While the Legislature wanted the report released on schedule (or quickly) they did not vote to accept it; and on a more partisan note - Republican state Sen. Gary Stevens, a member of the committee, cautioned everyone to look at the report with a "jaundiced eye," indicating that it is not a perfect report.
Unfortunately, just as it has been since day one of the investigation, she has been considered guilty without due process. The sad thing is that of the many issues with this officer and his actions and threats I have heard no one dispute any of them. All that has been brought up is the accusation that the Gov. should not have pressured to have him removed. I know that two wrongs don't make a right, but what about the possibility that Monegan really was not doing his job?