Author Topic: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA  (Read 23273 times)

CurrieS103

  • NRA Life Member
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 798
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2008, 01:22:04 PM »
This entire thing may end up with Biden having to take the Oath, appoint a VP who will have to be confirmed with a 2/3 majority in both congressional houses.  The ball is in the Supreme Court's court...should be interesting.  Then again...lock and load 'cause the riots will happen.
Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence. The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference. - George Washington

TAB

  • DRTV Rangers
  • Top Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10236
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 103
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2008, 01:25:57 PM »
thats just it, there is a clear line of succession, for after the oath, before there is none.   I would not be shocked if they had another election.   Its a intresting legal question...
I always break all the clay pigeons,  some times its even with lead.

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7701
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 615
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2008, 02:00:44 PM »
Uh if the winning candidate is disqualified then shouldn't the second place candidate take the office???

Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW 1968-1972

pops1911

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 206
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #13 on: November 14, 2008, 02:04:50 PM »
Be careful how you answer - on one hand you have 'Greasy Joe' - on the other 'Billary'!!
"...it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds" -- Samual Adams

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2008, 02:17:07 PM »
"May you live in interesting times" is the Chinese version of "may the Bluebird of happiness take a dump on your life".
But political considerations aside I would be interested to see how they dealt with such an eventuality.
 I THINK TAB is only partly right, if B Ho were to DIE before taking the Oath the usual line of succession would apply, but disqualification ? ?  ???

Sponsor

  • Guest
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #15 on: Today at 09:05:03 AM »

alfsauve

  • Semper Vigilantes
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7701
  • DRTV Ranger
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 615
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2008, 02:35:36 PM »
Two situations if he is disqualified.

Before the electoral college:  then it seems the delegate should vote for the the second place winner from the election....McCain.

After the electoral college:  then it might seem to favor the normal constitutional secession.

Will work for ammo
USAF MAC 437th MAW 1968-1972

tombogan03884

  • Guest
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2008, 02:38:24 PM »
Two situations if he is disqualified.

Before the electoral college:  then it seems the delegate should vote for the the second place winner from the election....McCain.

After the electoral college:  then it might seem to favor the normal constitutional secession.



Sounds about right but the final decision would probably be left to the SCOTUS.

TAB

  • DRTV Rangers
  • Top Forum Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10236
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 103
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #17 on: November 14, 2008, 02:46:38 PM »
i would personally like to see another election.  People didn't vote for bidden... they  voted for Obama.
I always break all the clay pigeons,  some times its even with lead.

Neon Knight Anubis

  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 408
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 0
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #18 on: November 14, 2008, 03:15:31 PM »
The typical third in line is the Speaker, whether or not this actually happens we could potentially face a much stronger adversary, Nancy Pelosci. She may not have the charisma or the appeal of Obama to the general population but she has the political clout in congress and she's much more ambitious. At this point there really are no good options. A second election would be a fubar because who has the time/money/patience for another campaign, hell I'm going crazy from hearing about my state's damn runoff elections.

We certainly are living in those "interesting times".
We'll know for the first time
If we're evil or divine
We're the last in line

tt11758

  • Noolis bastardis carborundum (Don't let the bastards wear you down)
  • Top Forum Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5821
  • DRTV Ranger ~
    • 10-Ring Firearms Training
  • Liked:
  • Likes Given: 7
Re: 2 BREAKING NEWS DEVELOPMENTS - BERG v. OBAMA
« Reply #19 on: November 14, 2008, 05:22:56 PM »
The real question is... what happends if Obama turns out to be ineligible.   I would assume that means Bidden would take his place.

I really can't see any major political party backing some one that they could not prove they were eligible to hold that office.

Since Obama was the dem nominee, if he is ruled ineligble the dems have NO candidate in the Electoral College, and McCain/Palin will be partying like Kennedys (as will I) come January 20th!!
I love waking up every morning knowing that Donald Trump is President!!

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk