Hitler was an appropriate analogy, it was about a guy who earned his stripes in the military but still was not someone who made any useful contribution to supporting the troops.
I didn't indicate in any way that Murtha was a homicidal maniac. I assert that one man's impression of war is insignificant to the greater good.
I am of the same opinion as J. Robert Oppenheimer, that the voice of one should not have more influence over policy than any other. And as the man said this to the scientists who were having doubts about building the atomic bomb he stuck to his guns and continued the project.
Murtha's service does not give him a special voice that is above all others. I served my country too and while I appreciate his service, his is no more or less important than mine.
All men say that wars should not be fought, but what happens when not fighting the war is killing more people than fighting it would? Or how about this "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
At what point are we as good men supposed to say "This only means people located within our geographical borders"? I for one am sickened by people who think that this universal equality does not apply to people in Iraq, Iran, or Sudan. It is a betrayal of the Founding Fathers and the basis of this country to avoid a fight and allow others to live in chains.