I've never seen a Baptist drive a truck load of C4 into a building simply because someone didn't share their religion.
That's the main difference.
And while it may be true that most Muslims are 'peaceable' in one sense, one mantra of their religion, is "make the world Muslim".
You might be right about that.I guess McVey doesn't count because he bombed a government building? Going back to my earlier question, if there were Saudi or Iraqi troops living in the US, do you think anyone here would attack them? Or would we just be good Christians and let them be?
Christianity also teaches that anyone who's not one of us is going to hell and it's a Christian's responsibility to convert and save them.
I don't remember the last time a Muslim invaded most of Europe, allied themselves with the Japanese, and started a World War while killing millions of civilians in camps. That was all Christian. Oh, wait, now that I think about it, I do remember something like that... a Christian just did it more recently and added the camp idea.
If I'm not mistaken, the people who landed in the US and slaughtered the indigenous people were Christian ("seeking religious freedom" as the classic story goes).
Right now, the Muslim extremist groups are killing more Iraqis than they are Americans. Their actions are closer to LA Gangs shooting up a neighborhood. Yeah, they don't want the US there. They also have their own internal beefs to settle.
If you want to blame other religions for past atrocities, you've got to remember that it goes both ways. There isn't a religion out there that doesn't have members who have done heinous things in its name. Sometimes the leaders of that religion were even involved. I guess we could say the same things about countries. People from a country can do something horrible just as well as the government can, whether they were working together or not.