Here's The Financial Times' take on it (and they are about the most unbiased paper out there). You have to agree with Tom here. If this fool wanted to start a war of civilizations, why not kill a bunch of muslims and wait for retribution, and counter-retribution? I mean hell, Osama got that. He didn't blow up a few mosques and say "Take that America".
This guy is not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Not to mention, gunning down children at camp? Who the hell is going to sign on to that agenda? 
FQ13
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/55aab1f8-b60d-11e0-8bed-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1T5jbMg1O
"Those who do not learn history are condemned to repeat it." The liberal indoctrination you were subjected to in academia makes you over look the obvious.
The majority of ,so called, normal people will go along with it if it is marketed properly.
What civilized European society would go along with massacring people based on ethnicity or religion ?
And it wasn't just Nazi Germany, the Poles, Russians, Hungarians, Romanians, Ukrainians, and Latvians were all OK with it.
And it wasn't just in the 40's either, it was only a few years ago Serbs were massacring Muslims and Croats while Croats were dealing with their Serb and Muslim prisoners by lying them down in the street then driving tanks through.